- From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:09:01 -0600
- To: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Jerome, In my response to Peter I suggested a revision similar to your suggestion 1. - Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr [mailto:Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:03 AM To: Jeremy Carroll; www-webont-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Suntax comments on the Guide document Hi, In his message (Re: Suntax comments on the Guide document) of 31/12/2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > "In this document we present examples using the OWL XML syntax, >> assuming XML will be familiar to the largest audience. The standard >> for interchange of OWL assertions between tools depends on RDF >> triples. Note that OWL has been designed for maximal compatibility >> with RDF and RDF Schema. " > >This para seems to cause a lot of confusion. >The syntax used in the Guide is RDF/XML as described in the RDF Syntax Revised >found at >http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar Thanks this confirms my feelings that I was really generating RDF/XML. I suggest either revision 1: "In this document we present examples using the OWL RDF/XML syntax [REF1], assuming XML will be familiar to the largest audience. The standard for interchange of OWL assertions between tools depends on RDF triples. Note that OWL has been designed for maximal compatibility with RDF and RDF Schema. This syntax is different from the OWL XML presentation syntax [REF2]." or revision 2 (need to change the whole document and wine/food ontologies): "In this document we present examples using the OWL XML presentation syntax [REF2], assuming XML will be familiar to the largest audience. The standard for interchange of OWL assertions between tools depends on RDF triples. Note that OWL has been designed for maximal compatibility with RDF and RDF Schema. " One remark that has been raised in OntoWeb SIG Language meeting is that the Guide document is very good but we lacked some thing like a "grammar for OWL". OWL-XML provide such a grammar, but OWL-RDF does not provide (as far as I can see) a RDF-Schema (with typing information). PS: AS&S=Abstract Syntax and Semantics -- Jérôme Euzenat __ / /\ INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _ /_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_) 655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________ Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo 38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 10:09:31 UTC