Sunday, 1 September 1996
Saturday, 31 August 1996
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Refocusing on HTML
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD
- Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #259
- SELECT tab
- Client side form crash..
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD-Reply
Friday, 30 August 1996
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Has anyone constructed DTDs for MS IE 3.0 and/or latest Netscape??
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD -Reply
- Re: Type=File
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Re: backgrounds
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- Re: backgrounds
- RE: backgrounds
- Re: HTML Frames (enhancement request and SGML declarations)
- Re: My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- PROPOSAL FOR A MULTI-COLUMN SELECT ELEMENT WITHIN A FORM FIELD
- Re: backgrounds
- HTML dtd utilities
- My Friday-Before-Labor-Day Diatribe [Was: Frame document structure]
- pst: URL [Was: Suggestion]
- Re: backgrounds
- RE> backgrounds
- backgrounds
Sunday, 29 August 1976
Thursday, 29 August 1996
- Suggestion
- Re: Frames and Documents
- Re: Special Characters
- Re: Special Characters
- Special Characters
- Re: Frames and Documents
- Re: Little problem with table...
- Re: Frames and Documents
- Re: Frame document structure
- Re: Frame document structure
- Re: Frames and Documents
Sunday, 29 August 1976
Thursday, 29 August 1996
Wednesday, 28 August 1996
Saturday, 28 August 1976
Wednesday, 28 August 1996
- Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Frames and Documents
- Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
- RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Type=File
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Re: HTML 3.2 -- INPUT inside BODY?
- Re: HTML 3.2 -- INPUT inside BODY?
- HTML 3.2 -- INPUT inside BODY?
Tuesday, 27 August 1996
- W3C's importance was Re: onMouseOver in Cougar. (fwd)
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Wild prediction
- onMouseOver in Cougar. (fwd)
- Re: Wild prediction
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Wild prediction
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Why IDML exists (was: What are the problems with IDML?)
- Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: How should URL attribute values be parsed?
- onMouseOver in Cougar.
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
Thursday, 26 August 1976
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
Thursday, 1 June 1995
Sunday, 25 August 1996
- Frames still broke in NSN 3?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- RE: Frames Are Improving
- RE: Frames Are Improving
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Tuesday, 24 August 1976
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Tuesday, 24 August 1976
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Tuesday, 24 August 1976
Saturday, 24 August 1996
- RE: Frames Are Improving
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: history.go(-1) question
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- RE: Frames Are Improving
Tuesday, 24 August 1976
Friday, 23 August 1996
Saturday, 24 August 1996
- Validation
- RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- BGSOUND, no need for it (fwd)
- RE: Background Soundtracks (fwd)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- RE: Frames Are Improving
- history.go(-1) question
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
Friday, 23 August 1996
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
- RE: Frames Are Improving
- BGSOUND, no need for it
- Re: Frames Are Improving
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: Amaya, a new Web browser/editor released by W3C
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Frames Are Improving
- SGML and DTDs
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Display info in HTTP -- Was: Frames Are Improving
- Proposition for tag <JUNK>
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- RE: Background Soundtracks
- Re: Background Soundtracks
- Re: Frames Are Improving
- Amaya, a new Web browser/editor released by W3C
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
Sunday, 25 August 1996
Friday, 23 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Frames Are Improving
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames Are Improving
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames Are Improving
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Background Soundtracks
- Re: Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames Are Improving
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them? - Summary
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Frames, my opinion
- Re: OFF-TOPIC: Provider blues
- Re: Frames Are Improving
- RTMW '96 - Call for participation
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Background Soundtracks
- Frames Are Improving
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Frames, my opinion
- Background Soundtracks
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
Sunday, 22 August 1976
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Problems/Question with Cougar
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
Sunday, 22 August 1976
Thursday, 22 August 1996
Wednesday, 21 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
Saturday, 21 August 1976
Wednesday, 21 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- automatic configuration for proxy
- SiteMill code (Was: Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd))
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
Tuesday, 20 August 1996
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd)
- Re: Question on TABLE's with THEAD/TBODY/TFOOT
- Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd)
- Question on TABLE's with THEAD/TBODY/TFOOT
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: what happened to align=justify? (fwd)
- Re: what happened to align=justify? (fwd)
- Re: PUT method (fwd)
- Pushpins: patented? [was: Frames - does anyone like them? ]
- Frames - does anyone like them?
- Re: New HTML 3.2 reference available
Monday, 19 August 1996
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: To <P> or not to <P> (fwd)
- what happened to align=justify? (fwd)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- To <P> or not to <P> (fwd)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
Tuesday, 20 August 1996
Monday, 19 August 1996
- Re: what happened to align=justify?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- BrowserCaps (was Re: To <P> or not to <P>)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: what happened to align=justify?
- Re: irc: [was: New URN suggestion ]
Sunday, 18 August 1996
- Re: Web Futures (was: HTML Futures (was: to <P>...))
- Re: Web Futures (was: HTML Futures (was: to <P>...))
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- HTML Futures (was: to <P>...)
- HTML, SGML and Tag Minimization (was: </P>)
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: irc: [was: New URN suggestion ]
- irc: [was: New URN suggestion ]
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft
- Re: HTML 3.2 Resources
Saturday, 17 August 1996
- Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #250
- Re: what happened to align=justify?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- mailto:www-html@www0.cern.ch
- mailto:www-html@www0.cern.ch
- Re: User-definable scheme types
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- New URN suggestion
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: Suggestion for FRAME code extension
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
Friday, 16 August 1996
Saturday, 17 August 1996
Friday, 16 August 1996
- Suggestion for FRAME code extension
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft
- Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- To <P> or not to <P>
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-05.txt
- Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft
- Re: New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft
- What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- What are the problems with IDML? (fwd)
- What are the problems with IDML?
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft (fwd)
Thursday, 15 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
- Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
- New features in latest HTML 3.2 draft
Wednesday, 14 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Generic Markup
- New HTML 3.2 reference available
- Re: Tag Soup.
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Tag Soup.
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
- HTML 3.2 Resources (fwd)
- Re: HTML 3.2 Resources
- HTML 3.2 Resources
- Sorry, please don't send me any Email.
- 3.2 DOCTYPE Changed...
- Re: Tag Soup.
- Re: Tag Soup.
- Re: Justification
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
- Re: Generic Markup
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
Monday, 12 August 1996
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
- Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
- Re: Generic Markup
- Tag Soup.
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
- Re: W3C and Handle technology
Monday, 12 August 1996
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
Monday, 12 August 1996
- Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
- Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
- Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
Thursday, 12 August 1976
Monday, 12 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
- Netscape 3.0...A Long Way to Go
- A bit of unintentional levity
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
Sunday, 11 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup
- Re: Generic Markup
Wednesday, 11 August 1976
- Resizing issues (was Re: Images in Horizontal rules)
- phones (was Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar)
Sunday, 11 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
Saturday, 10 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Take me off!
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- frames (fwd)
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
Friday, 9 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply (fwd)
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- FILE: as FORM ACTION attribute value?
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules
- RE: Images in Horizontal rules......
- frames
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply (fwd)
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply (fwd)
Thursday, 8 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
Wednesday, 7 August 1996
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- sgml-lex python interface
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: AREA tags
Tuesday, 6 August 1996
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: Font Embedding
- Re: AREA tags
- Re: AREA tags
- Re: Uses of <I>
- AREA tags
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: Shadows.
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
- Re: Uses of <I>
- Re: Shadows.
- Re: Shadows.
- Re: Uses of <I>
- Re: Font Embedding
- Font Embedding
Monday, 5 August 1996
Saturday, 3 August 1996
Monday, 5 August 1996
- Re: Uses of <I>
- Re: Uses of <I>
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
Monday, 26 August 1996
Saturday, 3 August 1996
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
- Re: NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #243
- NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #243
- Re: Netscape and SGML
- Uses of <I>
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
Friday, 2 August 1996
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
- Re: What about ?
- Re: Tastes great! Less filling!
- Re: Tastes great! Less filling!
- Tastes great! Less filling!
- Re: What about ?
- Re: What about ?
- Re: Netscape and SGML
- Netscape and SGML
- i know this is absolutely the wrong forum for this but...
Monday, 2 August 1976
Thursday, 1 August 1996
- NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #242
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply
- Re: Proposal: Definition Popup Tag
- Re: What about ?
- Re: What about ?
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply
- Re: Proposal: Definition Popup Tag
- Proposal: Definition Popup Tag
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
- NDN: www-html-d Digest V96 #241
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)
- Re: What about ?
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply
- Re: Render EM as underline [was: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar] (fwd)