- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 15:02:23 -0700
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Simon Cox wrote: > Am I unusual in disliking these? Apparently not here. I like them better than not. When used with a graphical index/contents list of fixed size, they can make a site more easily navigable, and they're handy with JavaScript for maintaining control of the window. Not well-implemented, IMO. At first look I thought "[expletive forgotten]! Why all these arbitrary limitations?" MSIE 3 added one wished-for enhancement: zero borders. But apparently '0' has been redefined by MS. There's still a 2-pixel gray line between frames. > ...wouldn't it be better to work towards something that used a > more modern interface? Or at least restrict them to the BANNER... The interface style is a function of the GUI. The browser will use the API of same. You can open additional windows with JavaScript. But although you can size them, you can't position them, nor can you give them a keep-on-top property. Another case of arbitrary limitations. Banner is simply a more restrictive tiled frame. Am I unusual in disliking calls for restrictions? David Perrell
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 1996 18:03:47 UTC