- From: Marc Salomon <marc@ckm.ucsf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:02:24 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Mike Wexler <mwexler@mv.us.adobe.com> wrote: |Classes should not be used to convey semantic information to indexers. This |should be left to element tags and other attriubtes. I agree that there is a need to allow for a way for the "semantic classing" of generic elements that is independent from style classing: <DIV CLASS="sidebar" ROLE="section"> This construct uses the proposed CLASS attribute to invoke the CSS scheme for rendering according to class "sidebar" on this structural element that is semantically equivalent (ROLE=) to any other section. There should be well-known standards (perhaps TEI-like?) for semantic classing of structural elements, as adding new elements to the element soup for each possible role is a mess. Doesn't CSS allow for importing styles via link so that de facto standards can be implied? |If we need a much larger set of standard elements, than lets create them. |Maybe the solutions is to get the UAs to start handling SGML documents with |DTDs specified by a URL. Than any organization could create a DTD that matched |the needs of its members. Some DTDs might be shared by a large number of |organiations. Others might be specific to a certain author. Sure would be nice. -marc --
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 1996 17:22:12 UTC