- From: Abigail <abigail@uk.fnx.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 13:52:33 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Keith Calvert Ivey wrote: > > "Christopher R. Maden" <crm@ebt.com> wrote about <I>: > > > I *never* use it otherwise. There's always a reason I think > > it should be italicized. Title? Use <cite>. Foreign word? > > Use <em>. Variable? Use <var>. Ditto boldface or > > underlining. > > I agree that there's always a reason that something's > italicized, but the reason can't always be described in the > current state of HTML. That and automated conversion are the > reasons I use <I>. I don't understand why marking a > foreign word with <EM> when you're not emphasizing it is any > better than marking it with <I>. What if someone uses italics as default font? Maybe they like it. Sure, you can say they shouldn't, but using ones preferences is the _whole_ point of using HTML. If usage of <I> in stead of <EM> becomes common practice, people are forced to use non-italic default fonts, partially defeating the whole point of HTML. Abigail
Received on Monday, 5 August 1996 08:52:44 UTC