- From: TODD FRETER <TFRETER@novell.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 07:13:26 -0700
- To: davidp@earthlink.net, www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
>>> "David Perrell" <davidp@earthlink.net> 08/22/96 02:12pm >>> :Paul Prescod wrote: :> Frames have their uses. But I wonder if they should be in _HTML_. Whether to :> use frames or not is basically a design question, not content question. So :> "frames" are good, but <FRAME> is bad. In other words, Frames should be :> specified in style sheets. : :Fisher Mark wrote: :> Very good point -- Frames should be in style sheets. Unfortunately, I :> haven't studied CSS yet -- any experts wish to speak up? : :No expert, but disagree. "Design question" is irrelevant to where :frames belong. Document structure is itself a design of sorts. Frames :are more structure than presentation, and different presentation :styles can appear in different frames. Frames are not a style applied :to content, but rather containers for different content. Frames do :not belong in style sheets. I respectfully disagree. (I also decline to claim expertise.) The same semantic content can be presented with or without frames. If you see HTML as a _weakly_ semantic markup language, as I do, then frames aren't relevant to the structure of content. If you see HTML as a presentational markup language, as I do, then frames are part of the structure of presentation. Frames can be keyed to the semantic structure of the information; I can author in a somewhat more semantically-oriented DTD like DocBook, which has no frames, and can transform the DocBook content into HTML with or without frames. That tells me that frames are more of a stylistic component. -Todd Freter. Corporate Publishing Services Novell, Inc. San Jose, CA tfreter@novell.com
Received on Saturday, 24 August 1996 13:33:52 UTC