- From: Mary Morris <marym@Finesse.COM>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 19:33:51 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
> >They go into an alternate suggestion at http://www.identify.com/ > > Yes, I've looked at their system. I've discussed some issues with them. So > far I am totally unimpressed. The scheme seems to me to be a half-baked, > proprietary, incompatible lump of extensions. I've heard one other person say that they aren't SGML enough, now I hear this. Can someone please be specific about the problems. Can someone give me an example or suggest better alternatives that do bypass the biggest reason that they went around META tags to begin with - namely the cumbersomeness of such long round about definitions. I'd really like to understand the details of why they aren't appropriate. Mary Morris
Received on Thursday, 15 August 1996 22:32:17 UTC