- From: Murray Altheim <murray@spyglass.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:42:49 -0500
- To: marc@ckm.ucsf.edu
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
>Murray Altheim <murray@spyglass.com> wrote:
>|I'd caution against making ANY assumptions about screen size or resolution
>|(which noboby has mentioned yet).
>
>There's a draft before the HTTP-wg [1] that attempts to address this issue:
>
> ABSTRACT
>
> User-Agent Display Attributes Headers provide a means for an HTTP
> client and server to negotiate for content dependent on the
> client display capabilities.
[...]
Marc,
You are correct -- server-side content negotiation can certainly provide a
method to deliver content based on UA ability to handle it. But including
FRAME within HTML and promoting it as acceptable forgets one thing: few
document authors have either the server access or the knowledge to provide
content-negotiated solutions. Large organizations even have difficulty in
that authors are often not also server admins.
So I would suspect that the vast majority of frame docs on the Web are
provided with no content-negotiation alternative.
I was one of the minions who at one time was proposing client-side content
negotiation within HTML, but not many folks seemed interested. Seems SGML
marked sections were simply too obtuse, and registry was seen as a problem.
Of course, nobody blinks about inline scripting...
Murray
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Murray Altheim, Program Manager
Spyglass, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
email: <mailto:murray@spyglass.com>
http: <http://www.stonehand.com/murray/murray.html>
"Give a monkey the tools and he'll eventually build a typewriter."
Received on Thursday, 22 August 1996 17:40:15 UTC