- From: Murray Altheim <murray@spyglass.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:42:49 -0500
- To: marc@ckm.ucsf.edu
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
>Murray Altheim <murray@spyglass.com> wrote: >|I'd caution against making ANY assumptions about screen size or resolution >|(which noboby has mentioned yet). > >There's a draft before the HTTP-wg [1] that attempts to address this issue: > > ABSTRACT > > User-Agent Display Attributes Headers provide a means for an HTTP > client and server to negotiate for content dependent on the > client display capabilities. [...] Marc, You are correct -- server-side content negotiation can certainly provide a method to deliver content based on UA ability to handle it. But including FRAME within HTML and promoting it as acceptable forgets one thing: few document authors have either the server access or the knowledge to provide content-negotiated solutions. Large organizations even have difficulty in that authors are often not also server admins. So I would suspect that the vast majority of frame docs on the Web are provided with no content-negotiation alternative. I was one of the minions who at one time was proposing client-side content negotiation within HTML, but not many folks seemed interested. Seems SGML marked sections were simply too obtuse, and registry was seen as a problem. Of course, nobody blinks about inline scripting... Murray ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Murray Altheim, Program Manager Spyglass, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts email: <mailto:murray@spyglass.com> http: <http://www.stonehand.com/murray/murray.html> "Give a monkey the tools and he'll eventually build a typewriter."
Received on Thursday, 22 August 1996 17:40:15 UTC