- From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Jason O'Brien" <jaobrien@fttnet.com>
- cc: "'www'" <www-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 Aug 1996, Jason O'Brien wrote: > > I once swore off of frames forever, but since the latest versions of > Netscape and MS Internet Explorer now allow for better navigation within > frames, (hitting the BACK button at least allows going back within the > frame) which was the big problem before, I think frames are becoming > easier to use and incorporate into web page design. The biggest problem > still to solve is the fact that everyone views web pages on different > display sizes, and this will forever be a problem for designing frames -- > does anyone else have a standard they design for? I have learned that > most people use 800x600, the in-between on most PC's -- does anyone else > have any kind of statistics on what most people use? I don't know if > this problem will ever be solved when dealing with frame design. It turns out that MSIE is including screen size in their headers. I generated stats a few weeks ago. From about a million or so hits on XMission: 37.3% ( 640,480 ) 39.3% ( 800,600 ) 20.1% ( 1024,768 ) 1.4% ( 1152,864 ) 0.1% ( 1152,882 ) 1.8% ( 1280,1024 ) 0.1% ( 1600,1200 ) This is probably biased towards the high end because of minimum system requirements to run Win95/NT. -- Benjamin Franz
Received on Thursday, 22 August 1996 13:15:15 UTC