- From: John Bro, InterSoft Solutions, Inc <iss@FinanceHub.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:02:54 -0400
- To: Sunil Mishra <smishra@cc.gatech.edu>, www-html@w3.org
> \\ I disagree in that navigation is actually more difficult to a > user. I \\ agree on your later statement that they're not usually > "well-implemented". \\ Navigation can be confusing and bewildering This discussion of "well-implemented" frames has pulled me out of lurkerdom to ask what you think of our use of them. http://www.FinanceHub.com/ is implemented with one 3-frames version of the homepage, such that all pages internal to the FinanceHub display in the main window, and all links out have target="_top". The left column frame is the ToC of the entire site (with a prominent "Quit Frames" option) and internal links that stay in the ToC frame. The bottom horizonal frame has a button bar to the main sections (a bit redundant since every page footer has a button bar, but the framed one stays put. I am having trouble positioning the darn bar in the frame, tho). About half of the unique visitors to the homepage (= about 1/4 of the unique visitors to the site) load the frames version, and an ave. of less than 10% meet with "your browser doesn't support frames - try this one instead" (browsers are selectively redirected to frames/non-frames versions). I've had one complaint and quite a few compliments so far, but I'd like to know what the www-html'ers think of this way of implementing frames. I know I like getting around the site with these frames, but of course, I already know it too well already. Your private or public comments are welcome. thanks, John
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 1996 14:07:55 UTC