Wednesday, 31 October 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-182 (MikeO): protocol for user agents to indicate whether a request with DNT set is 1st party or 3rd party [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Graduated response (ACTION-279)
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-254: Draft text on freq. capping that would avoid new definitions and/or remove redundant normative requirement
- Re: slides from final session of AMS f2f
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-182 (MikeO): protocol for user agents to indicate whether a request with DNT set is 1st party or 3rd party [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- Re: update: action-324, public compliance texts (issue-45)
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- slides from final session of AMS f2f
- update: action-324, public compliance texts (issue-45)
- RE: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- RE: Graduated response (ACTION-279)
- Re: Draft Agenda for 31 October 2012 call (EU: 1 hour earlier than usual...)
- RE: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- action-324, public compliance texts (issue-45)
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- Re: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- ACTION-274: Propose non-normative text on service providers to clarify "independent use" (with rvaneijk)
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- Draft Agenda for 31 October 2012 call (EU: 1 hour earlier than usual...)
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- Re: times and time zones for today's call
- Re: Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text
- RE: ACTION-254: Draft text on freq. capping that would avoid new definitions and/or remove redundant normative requirement
- times and time zones for today's call
- Re: ACTION-254: Draft text on freq. capping that would avoid new definitions and/or remove redundant normative requirement
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text
- ACTION-314: Draft non-normative examples of how a multi-domain site technically can ask for exceptions
- ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- action-320, out of band consent
- RE: ACTION-254: Draft text on freq. capping that would avoid new definitions and/or remove redundant normative requirement
- Modifying a DNT Header (ISSUE-153, ACTION-285)
Tuesday, 30 October 2012
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- action-319: Draft non-normative text on how to accomplish non-JS third parties that want to request for exceptions (with lou)
Monday, 29 October 2012
- RE: my questions
- Re: my questions
- RE: my questions
- Re: action-277, proposed edit to compliance
- Re: my questions
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- ISSUE-45 managing compliance mode tokens
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- action-277, proposed edit to compliance
Sunday, 28 October 2012
- Re: affiliation change
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-185 (WebWide Not): There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-185 (WebWide Not): There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- tracking-ISSUE-185 (WebWide Not): There should not be an API for web-wide exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- affiliation change
Saturday, 27 October 2012
- RE: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions a Compliance]
Friday, 26 October 2012
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Minor TPE action-item edits, done
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
Thursday, 25 October 2012
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- stop the flame wars, now.
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Normative text for exceptions based on adrianba's proposal (ACTION-313)
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Normative text for exceptions based on adrianba's proposal (ACTION-313)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Definition of "visit" (ACTION-303)
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
- Re: ACTION-262 Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-262 Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ACTION-262 Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Your W3C affiliation / on tone
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- RE: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: Definition of "visit" (ACTION-303)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- RE: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Your W3C affiliation with Stanford University?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Normative text for exceptions based on adrianba's proposal (ACTION-313)
- Re: Definition of "visit" (ACTION-303)
- RE: Definition of "visit" (ACTION-303)
- URL re-direction (ACTION-304)
- Definition of "visit" (ACTION-303)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: my questions
- Barring software from altering a DNT signal set by a user agent (ACTION-284)
- Graduated response (ACTION-279)
- RE: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ACTION-262 Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- ACTION-262 Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Retention with grace period (ACTION-266)
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- RE: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-297: Update minimization text
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: my questions
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: my questions
- on tone
- Re: my questions
- RE: my questions
- RE: my questions
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-297: Update minimization text
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-260: Update debugging text (add normative 'short term', 'diagnostic', expand on or replace "graduated response")
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: my questions
- RE: my questions
- Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Wednesday, Oct 24th Meeting Regrets
- RE: my questions
- Proposed definitions of Share and Collect
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: my questions
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: my questions
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- FW: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Re: Linkability & European reality
- Linkability & European reality
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: my questions
- ACTION-318 Update draft with JS window/navigator change
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: my questions
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
Monday, 22 October 2012
- Re: my questions
- Re: my questions
- RE: my questions
- Re: my questions
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- for discussion, ANA/MRC relationship, digital, etc
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- FW: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
Sunday, 21 October 2012
- tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
Saturday, 20 October 2012
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
Saturday, 20 October 2012
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-182 (MikeO): protocol for user agents to indicate whether a request with DNT set is 1st party or 3rd party [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Adage article
- tracking-ISSUE-182 (MikeO): protocol for user agents to indicate whether a request with DNT set is 1st party or 3rd party [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
Friday, 19 October 2012
- RE: my questions
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ISSUE-176 (ACTION-301): Requirements on intermediaries/isps and header insertion that might affect tracking
- RE: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- RE: my questions
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
Thursday, 18 October 2012
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: Adage article
- Re: Adage article
- Adage article
- RE: my questions
- Re: my questions
- FW: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-265
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-265
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-265
- RE: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-265
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-265
- ACTION-295: Should v. Must
- Re: ACTION-265
- RE: ACTION-265
- Re: ACTION-265
- ACTION-291: Screen Size Requirements
- RE: Next F2F: W3C-Beach-House
- Next F2F: W3C-Beach-House
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call
- Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- RE: ACTION-306: Declared Data Definition
- Re: ACTION-306: Declared Data Definition
- RE: ACTION-306: Declared Data Definition
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call
- Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
- Re: ACTION-306: Declared Data Definition
- ACTION-263: Provide updated text regarding minimization
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- ACTION-254: Draft text on freq. capping that would avoid new definitions and/or remove redundant normative requirement
- ACTION-260: Update debugging text (add normative 'short term', 'diagnostic', expand on or replace "graduated response")
- Re: action-235 Draft middle way draft on permitted uses
- RE: my questions
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call
- ACTION-306: Declared Data Definition
- ACTION-265
- Agenda for 16 October 2012 call
- Agenda for 16 October 2012 call
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: FW: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- RE: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
Monday, 15 October 2012
- RE: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- RE: "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- Re: Global Considerations
- Global Considerations
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
Sunday, 14 October 2012
- FW: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
Saturday, 13 October 2012
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
Friday, 12 October 2012
- "forced choice" user agent implementation of DNT
- pushing for progress on 3.6: unlinkable data and logging
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: working towards affirmative opt-in consent
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- RE: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- RE: working towards affirmative opt-in consent
- Re: working towards affirmative opt-in consent
- Re: ACTION 270 - Propose existing DAA text for service providers
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- working towards affirmative opt-in consent
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: ACTION 270 - Propose existing DAA text for service providers
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
Thursday, 11 October 2012
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- RE: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- FW: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- RE: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- RE: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- FW: speech by VP Neelie Kroes
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- RE: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- RE: Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- Multiple DNT Headers (ACTION-283, ISSUE-150)
- User Agent Explanation (ACTION-281, ISSUE-172)
- Re: Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology Paper outlining harms of tracking
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- RE: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Interesting article
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- FW: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- RE: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions a Compliance]
- Re: Wednesday 10 October conference call
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- RE: ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- ACTION 270 - Propose existing DAA text for service providers
- ACTION-267 - Propose first/third party definitions from existing DAA documents
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- ISSUE-45 ACTION-246 Clarified proposal on compliance statements
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
Monday, 8 October 2012
- RE: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- Re: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- tracking-ISSUE-181: Finalize language regarding multiple first parties [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- RE: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- Re: Berkeley releases DNT survey research study
- Re: Berkeley releases DNT survey research study
- Berkeley releases DNT survey research study
- ACTION-297: Update minimization text
- Re: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Re: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
Sunday, 7 October 2012
Saturday, 6 October 2012
Friday, 5 October 2012
- Re: Defining Issue-5: What is tracking?
- Re: Defining Issue-5: What is tracking?
- RE: Formal Objection to the Decision Regarding A “Tri-part choice requirement for users agents.”
- RE: ISSUE-179: Make sure in the spec that we clarify information provided explicitly by a user (e.g. data typed into a form on a site with a clear privacy policy) is not subject to DNT.
- RE: ISSUE-179: Make sure in the spec that we clarify information provided explicitly by a user (e.g. data typed into a form on a site with a clear privacy policy) is not subject to DNT.
- RE: ISSUE-179: Make sure in the spec that we clarify information provided explicitly by a user (e.g. data typed into a form on a site with a clear privacy policy) is not subject to DNT.
- RE: Formal Objection to the Decision Regarding A “Tri-part choice requirement for users agents.”
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Wednesday 10 October conference call
- RE: Proposal for alternative exceptions API
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- RE: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- RE: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
Thursday, 4 October 2012
Friday, 5 October 2012
- Re: Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Are we trying to build a compliance system on poorly-defined core concepts?
- Proposal for alternative exceptions API
- RE: ISSUE-179: Make sure in the spec that we clarify information provided explicitly by a user (e.g. data typed into a form on a site with a clear privacy policy) is not subject to DNT.
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-180 (Keith Scarborough): Add "advertising" as a Permitted Use in the Compliance Document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: Formal Objection to the Decision Regarding A “Tri-part choice requirement for users agents.”
- RE: Defining Issue-5: What is tracking?
Thursday, 4 October 2012
- Re: Defining Issue-5: What is tracking?
- Defining Issue-5: What is tracking?
- ISSUE-176 (ACTION-301): Requirements on intermediaries/isps and header insertion that might affect tracking
- Formal Objection to the Decision Regarding A “Tri-part choice requirement for users agents.”
- Global Considerations Document lunchtime meeting notes
- tracking-ISSUE-180 (Keith Scarborough): Add "advertising" as a Permitted Use in the Compliance Document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- ISSUE-179: Make sure in the spec that we clarify information provided explicitly by a user (e.g. data typed into a form on a site with a clear privacy policy) is not subject to DNT.
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- tracking-ISSUE-178 (rachel_n_thomas): Add "Marketing" to list of permitted uses in Compliance document [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- ISSUE-177: Should we specify compliance requirements for software and hardware other than user agents? For example, is a web server package compliant if it tweaks DNT headers?
- ISSUE-176: Requirements on intermediaries/isps and header insertion that might affect tracking
- ISSUE-175: Have an appendix of best practices?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-173: The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the normal meaning [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Text for market research under issue 25
- ISSUE-174: How do we create straightforward compliance for implementers retaining data for N weeks or less?
- Re: Text for market research under issue 25
- Re: Text for market research under issue 25
- Text for market research under issue 25
- RE: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
Wednesday, 3 October 2012
- Re: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- Re: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- Re: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-173: The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the normal meaning [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- tracking-ISSUE-173: The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the normal meaning [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- tracking-ISSUE-172: How should user agents be required to provide information about DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification
- ACTION-277 (2) - suggested clean-up of the intro to compliance 6.1
- ACTION-277 - suggested clean-up of the intro to compliance 6.1
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification
- tracking-ISSUE-171: How can the exception API be used to grant site-wide exceptions to multiple sites? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- ISSUE-170: Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE-140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- ISSUE-169: What do we mean by tracking?
- Re: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- Re: Adobe Connect Link for Remote Attendees
- Adobe Connect Link for Remote Attendees
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification
- Re: Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE 140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Getting to f2f meeting from Amsterdam Centraal station
- Re: alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Issue-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- alternative to party and outsourcing definitions
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- RE: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- RE: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- European train strikes
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- RE: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Issue-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Proposal: all exemptions to be opt-out, and identity to be declared.
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- diffs between WD2 and WD3
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- RE: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- FW: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Issue-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
Monday, 1 October 2012
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Housekeeping: Closing ISSUE 140 (concrete/explicit list of exceptions)
- RE: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- RE: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Fwd: information on canal tour wednesday 3 october
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- RE: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September
- Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September