- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:17:07 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Oct 3, 2012, at 18:05 , Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> [as raised by Thomas Roessler] "top-level domain" has a technical >> meaning (the last part of a hostname, .com, .org etc.). We mean the >> hostname of the top-level browsing context (as defined by HTML), and I >> suggest the term "top-level origin" (with the meaning given, and with >> thanks to Adrian for the pointer) > > An "Origin" per RFC 6454 would include the resource identifier scheme, > like "http" or "https", so it would be odd for a "top-level origin" to > exclude it, as "hostname of the top-level browsing context" suggests. OK, sorry. Would 'top-level hostname' be OK? > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 08:17:57 UTC