Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose

You can imagine how it's hard to accommodate something for which we 
don't have a good working example. best, Joe

On 10/29/12 11:55 AM, Chris Mejia wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Good speaking with you the other day.  I think you are headed in the right
> direction here, but unfortunately, these audit reports are very
> sensitive-- as they go into granular detail, exposing exact methods,
> practices and trade secrets that are confidential and sensitive to the
> audited party, and thus are only shared with between the audited party,
> the 3rd party auditor, and the MRC in the strictest of confidence.  That
> stated, there may very well be something that can be shared to benefit
> this group, I just don't know what it would be, so I'd defer that question
> to the MRC itself.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Chris
>
> Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group |
> Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/26/12 5:09 PM, "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <joe@cdt.org> wrote:
>
>> Something that would be particularly valuable to methodologists like
>> myself would be if there were an MRC/audit/whatever report that could
>> be shared with this group in full (they presumably have a lot of
>> proprietary and confidential information, no?). Such a thing may not be
>> possible but it sounds like the independence of the MRC in ensuring ad
>> quality is an important part of the ad side of this. best, Joe
>>
>> --
>> Joseph Lorenzo Hall
>> Senior Staff Technologist
>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>> 1634 I ST NW STE 1100
>> Washington DC 20006-4011
>> (p) 202-407-8825
>> (f) 202-637-0968
>> joe@cdt.org
>>
>>
>

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Senior Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
1634 I ST NW STE 1100
Washington DC 20006-4011
(p) 202-407-8825
(f) 202-637-0968
joe@cdt.org

Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 18:09:49 UTC