- From: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:45:28 -0400
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- CC: public-tracking@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 13:45:57 UTC
Hi Jonathan, This does not do enough to ensure that a DNT signal reflects a users deliberate and informed choice. First, it should be a MUST. Second, it should apply to any software responsible for modifying or including the DNT header. Back in August I proposed the following: "A UA that allows or enables other software to alter the DNT setting MUST ensure that such alteration reflects the user's intent." That accomplishes what we want, doesn't it? -David On 10/31/12 1:52 AM, Jonathan Mayer wrote: > Proposed text: > > If user-controlled software modifies a DNT header sent by a user > agent, it is a best practice for the software to clearly explain its > modifications to the user. >
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 13:45:57 UTC