Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose

On 10/26/12 3:30 PM, Walter van Holst wrote:
> I still believe that a
> commercially acceptable level of measurement is still possible through
> the application of cryptographic hashing (I'll also respond to Roy's
> remark in this regard), if only because we manage to do so in Europe
> too.
Perhaps. But, regardless, it's not going to possible for this group to 
define what is a commercially acceptable level of measurement. We should 
return our focus to the task at hand: "a simple machine-readable 
preference expression mechanism."