- From: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:55:12 +0000
- To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>, "rob@blaeu.com" <rob@blaeu.com>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Dobbs, Brooks" <brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com>
Hi Joe, Good speaking with you the other day. I think you are headed in the right direction here, but unfortunately, these audit reports are very sensitive-- as they go into granular detail, exposing exact methods, practices and trade secrets that are confidential and sensitive to the audited party, and thus are only shared with between the audited party, the 3rd party auditor, and the MRC in the strictest of confidence. That stated, there may very well be something that can be shared to benefit this group, I just don't know what it would be, so I'd defer that question to the MRC itself. Best Regards, Chris Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group | Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB On 10/26/12 5:09 PM, "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <joe@cdt.org> wrote: >Something that would be particularly valuable to methodologists like >myself would be if there were an MRC/audit/whatever report that could >be shared with this group in full (they presumably have a lot of >proprietary and confidential information, no?). Such a thing may not be >possible but it sounds like the independence of the MRC in ensuring ad >quality is an important part of the ad side of this. best, Joe > >-- >Joseph Lorenzo Hall >Senior Staff Technologist >Center for Democracy & Technology >1634 I ST NW STE 1100 >Washington DC 20006-4011 >(p) 202-407-8825 >(f) 202-637-0968 >joe@cdt.org > >
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 15:56:17 UTC