Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose

On 10/24/12 12:45 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote:

> My counter text proposal is therefore:
> SILENCE <i.e. we do not deal with it in DNT>

Normally I wouldn't concur, but given the MRC discussion's derailment I
think this the least bad compromise on this matter. I definitely agree
that Amy's proposed text has too many loopholes.



Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 10:05:03 UTC