- From: Chris Pedigo <CPedigo@online-publishers.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:35:38 +0000
- To: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
Mike, pardon the basic question, what do you mean by "resource handler?" -----Original Message----- From: Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:28 PM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] tracking-ISSUE-183 (Tk E ): Additional Tk header status value for EU [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/183 Raised by: Mike O'Neill On product: Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) In Europe and other jurisdictions the requirement will probably be that resource handlers accessed in a first-party context conform as a third-party. In these cases resource handlers could place a Tk header in the response with a status of 3 “The designated resource is designed for use within a third-party context and conforms to the requirements on a third party”, but the value and the text are confusing in this situation. Even though the overwhelming majority of these resource handlers will have been designed for use in a first-party context the Tk response they emit portrays them as third-party. This could cause confusion for implementers, leading to a loss of interoperability. It might be better to insert a new single character status value ( in paragraph 5.2) for this situation for instance: E The designated resource may be designed for use in a first-party context but conforms to the requirements on a third party. This is functionally similar to the 3 response but be more appropriate for the majority case in these jurisdictions.
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 13:36:06 UTC