Re: Proposed definitions of Share and Collect


thanks for the comment. Our proposal says "transfer or copy". Even 
for real time, data is transferred. And it is legally established 
since a long time that even an ephemeral copy for real time is a 
copy (for the purpose of IPR). So why would we have a different view 


On Wednesday 24 October 2012 08:34:55 Rob van Eijk wrote:
> Amy,
> Does providing a copy imply that the data is stored first?
> If so, the definition of sharing does not take into account the
> element of real time, which is seen in RTB.
> On 24-10-2012 6:09, Amy Colando (LCA) wrote:
> > Per an action assigned to me in Amsterdam, I'm submitting a
> > couple of proposed verb definitions for discussion by the
> > group.  I worked on these with a small group, including David
> > W., Rigo, Chris Pedigo and Susan Israel.  I can't say that we
> > are in total agreement, but we wanted to share our work product
> > to date in order to keep the process moving forward.  Looking
> > forward to feedback.
> > 
> > Collect: a party "collects" data if it receives the data and
> > stores it for more than a transient period.
> > 
> > Share: A party "shares" data if it transfers or provides a copy
> > of data that it has collected to any other party

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 10:45:22 UTC