- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:44:55 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org, rob@blaeu.com
Rob, thanks for the comment. Our proposal says "transfer or copy". Even for real time, data is transferred. And it is legally established since a long time that even an ephemeral copy for real time is a copy (for the purpose of IPR). So why would we have a different view here? Rigo On Wednesday 24 October 2012 08:34:55 Rob van Eijk wrote: > Amy, > > Does providing a copy imply that the data is stored first? > > If so, the definition of sharing does not take into account the > element of real time, which is seen in RTB. > > On 24-10-2012 6:09, Amy Colando (LCA) wrote: > > Per an action assigned to me in Amsterdam, I'm submitting a > > couple of proposed verb definitions for discussion by the > > group. I worked on these with a small group, including David > > W., Rigo, Chris Pedigo and Susan Israel. I can't say that we > > are in total agreement, but we wanted to share our work product > > to date in order to keep the process moving forward. Looking > > forward to feedback. > > > > Collect: a party "collects" data if it receives the data and > > stores it for more than a transient period. > > > > Share: A party "shares" data if it transfers or provides a copy > > of data that it has collected to any other party
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 10:45:22 UTC