- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:42:11 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <506BEC53.3000000@schunter.org>
Hi Jonathan, thanks for the feedback! As part of the other response, you said that you disagree with the all-or-nothing approach of the API. I agree that this needs discussion. ISSUE-140 was about whether explicit-explicit exceptions shall be possible. According to my understanding, our conclusion was that this should be possible: - A site can publish its third-parties using the tracking-status resource (field third-party) - A user agent MAY constrain a site-wide exception to this list of third parties - A user agent is free to not display those lists as part of the user interface (e.g., using one UI for site-wide with and without lists of third-parties) I double checked and I believe that this agreement may currently NOT be fully reflected in the draft. As a consequence, I will leave ISSUE-140 open. TODO: - If you disagree with the outlined agreement, please provide alternative text - If you agree with the outlined agreement, please continue to double check that we will follow through along those lines. Is this OK with you? Regards, matthias On 02/10/2012 23:44, Jonathan Mayer wrote: > Matthias, > > You proposed this resolution in Bellevue, where it met with sustained > objections. We do not have agreement on whether to include a > site-specific exception API, nor do we have agreement on its design. > ISSUE-140 should not be CLOSED. > > Jonathan > > On Monday, October 1, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel > Corporation) wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I did some housekeeping and cleaned up our issue list prior to the >> Amsterdam face2face. >> >> ISSUE-140: Concrete list of domain-names for site-specific exceptions >> - We agreed that such a list can be published at the well-known location >> - This is part of the current draft >> - I consider this issue closed and changed its status accordingly >> >> Please drop me a line, if I misinterpreted or misstated our current >> status. >> >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 08:42:43 UTC