- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:47:52 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <639CFE17-274E-40C2-95A0-9AEC88E64C6E@consumerwatchdog.org>
I would want to include collection and correlation of data by the first party in the definition of tracking. I would then specifically enumerate which tracking activities would be permissible under the standard for the first party. ---------- John M. Simpson Consumer Advocate Consumer Watchdog 2701 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 112 Santa Monica, CA,90405 Tel: 310-392-7041 Cell: 310-292-1902 www.ConsumerWatchdog.org john@consumerwatchdog.org On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Oct 1, 2012, at 5:43 PM, John Simpson wrote: > >> Nonetheless, here is a proposed definition of tracking, with which I could live: >> >> "Tracking is the collection and correlation of data about the Internet activities of a particular user, computer, or device, over time and across a website or websites." > > Not bad, but I think we should try to exclude functionality within a > single first-party context. I ran across another definition yesterday: > > http://blog.privacychoice.org/2011/03/22/a-working-definition-of-do-not-track/ > > "The non-consensual use or transfer > of behavioral data collected > across websites or applications > as to an individual, computer or device." > > which I think is pretty close, but the wording is tortuous. > > How about: > > "Tracking is any non-consensual collection, correlation, or transfer of > data about the Internet activities of a particular user, user agent, or > device beyond the (first party) context in which that activity occurred." > > Cheers, > > ....Roy >
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:47:52 UTC