- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:18:59 -0700
- To: Amy Colando (LCA) <acolando@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <8742184C-74F4-45B4-82E8-389632147C61@consumerwatchdog.org>
Amy, A clarifying question: Can you please give a use case for what sort of data would be collected for "relevant self-regulatory requirements"? Thanks, John ---------- John M. Simpson Consumer Advocate Consumer Watchdog 2701 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 112 Santa Monica, CA,90405 Tel: 310-392-7041 Cell: 310-292-1902 www.ConsumerWatchdog.org john@consumerwatchdog.org On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Amy Colando (LCA) wrote: > Apologies that I have lost track of Action number, which I will look up later. Many thanks to Vinay, MeMe and David W. for assisting with this text. > > 6.1.1.9 Compliance with Local Law and Public Purpose > > Normative: Regardless of DNT signal, information MAY be collected, retained, used and shared for complying with applicable laws, regulations, legal obligations and other public purposes, including, but not limited to, intellectual property protection, delivery of emergency services, and relevant self-regulatory verification requirements. > > Non-normative: This specification does not purport to require parties to breach existing contractual obligations. At the same time, it is expected that parties implementing this specification should not enter into new contractual obligations that have the effect of circumventing specification requirements. This specification recognizes that there are legitimate self-regulatory regimes that both protect consumer interests and govern certain data practices, and the specification does not intend to conflict with these regimes. However, parties should whenever possible adhere to the letter and spirit of this specification, and should not look to such regimes as merely a means to circumvent the specification. > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 20:18:54 UTC