- From: Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:13:56 -0700
- To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 19:14:25 UTC
The privacy advocates following this would DEFINITELY prefer this to be applied to first parties. But all the messaging **since the FTC report** has been clear that this process was to be limited. There are hundreds of messages on this topic from back in 2011. But in the interest of compromise and in order to jump start the working group, the privacy groups agreed to contain this process to 3rd parties. Maybe you are unfamiliar with this history because you have not been involved in the process that long??Otherwise, best I can guess is that you are trying to goad people into arguing on this point, with the hope that if there is enough critique from all sides, it will kill DNT. Lauren Gelman BlurryEdge Strategies 415-627-8512 On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Alan Chapell wrote: > I thought many of your would find this interesting… > > http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/real-impact-track/237808/ > > -a
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 19:14:25 UTC