Re: Definition of "visit" (ACTION-303)

On Wednesday 24 October 2012 15:19:03 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Perhaps it would me more useful to just expand the text
> without the HTML5 assumptions.

Now having some institutional interest, what about 

1/ taking the W3C HTML5 specification (we are W3C after all here)

2/ make a reference as the definition in the HTML Specification may 
change over time and create inconsistencies. 

Rigo

Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 06:38:55 UTC