Issue on bound() test?
Re: comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery
comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery
An observation that might be useful...
minutes RDF Data Access 29 Mar for review
RE: solution/variable bindings (was Re: pls consider comments on disjunction)
[Fwd: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access?]
release of Use Cases/Requirements delayed
Re: construct *
Regrets for 29th March
FYI: XQuery Update Facility Requirements 1st WD 11 Feb 2005
agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (tentative)
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (timezone FIX!)
scribe volunteer for 29 Mar, please?
pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- Re: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
- RE: pls consider comments on disjunction
Regrets for dawg telcon 2005-04-29
MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
Minor format change
Data binding resource
sparlx.rnc in CVS
UC&R updated
Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
- Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)
Graph/data model specification
on Reification Semantics
what about RDF format?
variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
- Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format)
Use cases for XML serialization
"privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol
why is where keyword optional?
sparqlx
Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
- Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments)
RE: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
how does select/project work with extra variables?
SPARQL Abstract Syntax
UC&R updated
references, acknowledgements
sparql-protocol.wsdl updated
UC&R updated
Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
- Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?
agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar
Comments list comments
- SELECT to involve expressions [was: Comments list comments]
- GROUP BY [was: Comments list comments]
- Re: Comments list comments
modulo operator dropped from editor's draft?
Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format
ACTION: propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple
ACTION: propose a test based on dawg-triple-pattern-002 with a . in a qname
minutes RDF Data Access 15 Mar ... IRC log enough?
Update on ORDERing solutions
protocol update delayed
RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
BaseDecl and PrefixDecl?
Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requir ement
Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.
XML serialization of SPARQL
Example in section 11.3 - prefix not declared, fails to use "&" f or function call.
11.2.1.8 sop:datatype uses non-xsd "integer" type.
foaf prefix not declared in example from section 11.2.1.4 sop:isB lank
Casting a literal to a typed literal?
Example in 10.4 is not valid per 17Feb05 grammar.
CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
- Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
- RE: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3?
Syntax error in example from Section 8.3 of 17 Feb 05 Working Dra ft?
scribe for tomorrow?
agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar
Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests
Minutes of 2005-03-08 Telecon for review
protocol doc changed...
rq23 update with latest syntax
Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
RE: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTL R.
Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
- Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR.
N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
- Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
- Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement
[kendall@monkeyfist.com: Re: CONSTRUCT *]
ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
- Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with
RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress)
- RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda
- RE: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress)
- regrets (was Re: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress))
Working Draft feedback items
notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session
CONSTRUCT *
RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes in progress: actions
- Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes in progress: actions
- RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review
SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
- Re: SPARQL syntax proposals
BOUND case-sensitivity
ftf5 ServiceDescription notes
Fwd: OWLBase Info
Testcase HTML building output
re: preparing for protocol...
protocol draft updated
Introduction: Bijan Parsia
Some more tests
Grammar update
preparing for protocol discussion
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
- Re: preparing for protocol discussion
WSDL2.0 for SPARQL Protocol
OPTIONALs and constraints
Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-02-22 for review
FTF hosting offer for June 2005
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/
agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb
Streaming version of CONSTRUCT
Problems with WITH and FROM
Values: general testing
Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures)
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures)
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures)
Value testing: implementing str()
Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs)
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs)
- Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs)
a service description approach to accessingCollections
sparqlParam: an approach to QL selection/migration
SPARQL-Q published
ftf5 attendance/regrets, WG membership standing
biblio/references
Tests for expressions : boolean effective values
Updated rasqal SPARQL demo
pls don't refer to DAWG in sparql abstract
Re: ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review]
ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review]
Warnings in SPARQL variable bindings results
agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Feb-1 Mar in Camridge, MA, USA (in progress)
publication appointment
ACTION: review "11 Testing Values"
agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Feb
on log:definitiveService
SPARQL and WSDL
Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
- Re: Minor Syntax issues
Minutes of 2005-02-08 Telecon for review
Review of RQ23 section 11, Testing Values
ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service
finding stable OPTIONAL query results [Was: question about combining patterns]
agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb
Regrets
Revised souce-named/untrusted-graph*.rq tests
Optionals and execution order
question about combining patterns
Resignation from DAWG
Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-02-01 for review
collection access: inferred property vs. syntax
BOUND test case
Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Feb
accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?
regrets
scribe for tomorrow, please?
F2F hosting offer for May 2005
XML Schema Datatypes and the Semantic Web
Definition of "RDF dataset"
LOAD, FROM, GRAPH and COFFEE
about OPTIONAL blocks
binary RDF
please registere for the Tech Plenary
minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (in progress; fun with actions)
nested SOURCE graph-patterns
Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
- Re: Some protocol & service description issues
Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
- Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql
any SOURCE * query example/test-case?
cancelling 25 Jan telcon (RDF Data Access non-agenda)
about the CONSTRUCT productions
[crschmidt@crschmidt.net: Re: RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"]
SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd)
comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005
some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design
Successive Bindings, cascaded queries in Algae2
rdql and n3 graphPatterns
Fwd: proposal to drop DESCRIBE from SPARQL
[Fwd: flexible SPARQL reification construct instead of hard-wired SOURCE keyword]
more positions on issues?
- issues poll: please partcipate! [was: more positions?]