public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2005 by author

Alberto Reggiori

• Re: ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Regrets (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: question about combining patterns (Thursday, 3 February)
• question about combining patterns (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-02-01 for review (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Definition of "RDF dataset" (Tuesday, 1 February)
• F2F hosting offer for May 2005 (Monday, 31 January)
• about OPTIONAL blocks (Wednesday, 26 January)
• nested SOURCE graph-patterns (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design (Monday, 24 January)
• any SOURCE * query example/test-case? (Monday, 24 January)
• about the CONSTRUCT productions (Monday, 24 January)
• some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Fwd: proposal to drop DESCRIBE from SPARQL (Monday, 17 January)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: on Reification Semantics (Saturday, 26 March)
• Minor format change (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: what about RDF format? (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Data binding resource (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Data binding resource (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Data binding resource (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Use cases for XML serialization (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Use cases for XML serialization (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Use cases for XML serialization (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session (Monday, 7 March)
• ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes in progress: actions (Friday, 4 March)
• Fwd: OWLBase Info (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Introduction: Bijan Parsia (Saturday, 26 February)

Bob MacGregor

• Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT (Monday, 21 February)
• Streaming version of CONSTRUCT (Sunday, 20 February)
• Problems with WITH and FROM (Sunday, 20 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Issue on bound() test? (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: Issue on bound() test? (Thursday, 31 March)
• comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery (Wednesday, 30 March)
• minutes RDF Data Access 29 Mar for review (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda+ on XML serialization (was Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)) (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed) (Tuesday, 29 March)
• privacy hook [was: agenda...] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed) (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: pls consider comments on disjunction (Sunday, 27 March)
• [Fwd: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access?] (Friday, 25 March)
• Use Cases and Requirements released [was: delayed] (Friday, 25 March)
• release of Use Cases/Requirements delayed (Friday, 25 March)
• FYI: XQuery Update Facility Requirements 1st WD 11 Feb 2005 (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (timezone FIX!) (Thursday, 24 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (tentative) (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: UC&R updated (WD candidate) (Thursday, 24 March)
• scribe volunteer for 29 Mar, please? (Thursday, 24 March)
• pls consider comments on disjunction (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• RE: Use cases for XML serialization (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Comments list comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Monday, 21 March)
• how does select/project work with extra variables? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• references, acknowledgements (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: UC&R updated (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar (Monday, 21 March)
• GROUP BY [was: Comments list comments] (Monday, 21 March)
• SELECT to involve expressions [was: Comments list comments] (Monday, 21 March)
• minutes RDF Data Access 15 Mar ... IRC log enough? (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• scribe for tomorrow? (Monday, 14 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests (Monday, 14 March)
• RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR. (Wednesday, 9 March)
• N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session (Monday, 7 March)
• RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress) (Monday, 7 March)
• notes from abstract protocol/WSDL ftf5 session (Sunday, 6 March)
• RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes in progress: actions (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Thursday, 3 March)
• ftf5 ServiceDescription notes (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: protocol draft updated (Sunday, 27 February)
• Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005 (Saturday, 26 February)
• preparing for protocol discussion (Thursday, 24 February)
• Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Cambridge teleconference times) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Monday, 21 February)
• a service description approach to accessingCollections (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: Some protocol & service description issues (Friday, 18 February)
• sparqlParam: an approach to QL selection/migration (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: on log:definitiveService (Friday, 18 February)
• ftf5 attendance/regrets, WG membership standing (Friday, 18 February)
• biblio/references (Thursday, 17 February)
• pls don't refer to DAWG in sparql abstract (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Feb-1 Mar in Camridge, MA, USA (in progress) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Feb (Monday, 14 February)
• on log:definitiveService (Monday, 14 February)
• SPARQL and WSDL (Monday, 14 February)
• sparql puncutation [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb] (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Resignation from DAWG (Monday, 7 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (please review) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Feb (Monday, 31 January)
• accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? (Monday, 31 January)
• scribe for tomorrow, please? (Monday, 31 January)
• minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (in progress; fun with actions) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• cancelling 25 Jan telcon (RDF Data Access non-agenda) (Monday, 24 January)
• issues poll: please partcipate! [was: more positions?] (Friday, 14 January)
• more positions on issues? (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: presentation about DAWG (Tuesday, 11 January)
• ftf4 version of protocol spec (Tuesday, 11 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 11 Jan (Monday, 10 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access meeting 19-20 Jan near Helsinki (running late) (Wednesday, 5 January)
• pls share hotel/flight updates (Wednesday, 5 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access meeting 19-20 Jan near Helsinki (running late) (Wednesday, 5 January)
• non-agenda: no meeting this week (Monday, 3 January)

Dave Beckett

• RE: pls consider comments on disjunction (Thursday, 24 March)
• RE: pls consider comments on disjunction (Thursday, 24 March)
• Regrets for dawg telcon 2005-04-29 (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: ACTION on xsi:type recommendation for variable binding results (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Working Draft feedback items (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: rq23 update with latest syntax (Friday, 11 March)
• regrets (was Re: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress)) (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Updated rasqal SPARQL demo (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Warnings in SPARQL variable bindings results (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: BOUND test case (Wednesday, 2 February)
• BOUND test case (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Tests dawg-opt-query-001 dawg-opt-query-002 and dawg-opt-query-003 (Tuesday, 11 January)

Dirk-Willem van Gulik

• Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd) (Thursday, 20 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: what about RDF format? (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Comments list comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol (Tuesday, 22 March)
• XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Minutes of 2005-03-08 Telecon for review (Thursday, 10 March)
• SPARQL syntax proposals (Thursday, 3 March)
• WSDL2.0 for SPARQL Protocol (Thursday, 24 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Wednesday, 23 February)
• publication appointment (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Some protocol & service description issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Review of RQ23 section 11, Testing Values (Friday, 11 February)
• Minutes of 2005-02-08 Telecon for review (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax (Wednesday, 2 February)
• collection access: inferred property vs. syntax (Tuesday, 1 February)
• LOAD, FROM, GRAPH (Friday, 28 January)
• LOAD, FROM, GRAPH and COFFEE (Thursday, 27 January)
• please registere for the Tech Plenary (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: rdql and n3 graphPatterns (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Successive Bindings, cascaded queries in Algae2 (Wednesday, 19 January)
• rdql and n3 graphPatterns (Monday, 17 January)

Giovanni Tummarello

• Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs) (Saturday, 19 February)

Hiroyuki Sato

• Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: regrets for 8march telcon (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: presentation about DAWG (Tuesday, 15 February)
• presentation about DAWG (Tuesday, 11 January)

Howard Katz

• Regrets for tomorrow (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: ACTION on xsi:type recommendation for variable binding results (Wednesday, 23 March)
• RE: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: Use cases for XML serialization (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: Use cases for XML serialization (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requir ement (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• RE: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• ACTION on xsi:type recommendation for variable binding results (Tuesday, 15 March)
• regrets for 8march telcon (Monday, 7 March)
• RE: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress) (Monday, 7 March)
• RE: RDF Data Access 8 Mar: agenda (in progress) (Monday, 7 March)
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-02-22 for review (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Tests for expressions : boolean effective values (Thursday, 17 February)
• regrets (Tuesday, 1 February)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format (Monday, 21 March)
• Call for Exclusions for "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Tuesday, 11 January)

James Cerra

• Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? (Thursday, 10 March)

Janne Saarela

• MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review (Thursday, 24 March)
• BOUND case-sensitivity (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Tuesday, 22 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ (Tuesday, 22 February)
• XML Schema Datatypes and the Semantic Web (Monday, 31 January)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed) (Tuesday, 29 March)

jos.deroo@agfa.com

• Re: ACTION: propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple (Sunday, 20 March)
• ACTION: propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple (Sunday, 20 March)
• ACTION: propose a test based on dawg-triple-pattern-002 with a . in a qname (Sunday, 20 March)
• Re: ACTION: review "11 Testing Values" (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Sunday, 6 March)
• Re: a service description approach to accessingCollections (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• ACTION: review "11 Testing Values" (Monday, 14 February)
• finding stable OPTIONAL query results [Was: question about combining patterns] (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: sparql puncutation [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb (Monday, 7 February)
• RE: question about combining patterns (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: regrets (Saturday, 8 January)
• ACTION: review message 538 tests (Friday, 7 January)
• ACTION: review message 538 tests (Friday, 7 January)

Kendall Clark

• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed) (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS (Thursday, 24 March)
• sparlx.rnc in CVS (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• UC&R updated (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: sparqlx (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: sparqlx (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: why is where keyword optional? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• why is where keyword optional? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• sparqlx (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 22 March)
• UC&R updated (Monday, 21 March)
• sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: UC&R updated (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• UC&R updated (Monday, 21 March)
• protocol update delayed (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: protocol doc changed... (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: protocol doc changed... (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Working Draft feedback items (Friday, 11 March)
• protocol doc changed... (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Tuesday, 8 March)
• [kendall@monkeyfist.com: Re: CONSTRUCT *] (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: CONSTRUCT * (Sunday, 6 March)
• re: preparing for protocol... (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: protocol draft updated (Sunday, 27 February)
• protocol draft updated (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005 (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: preparing for protocol discussion (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005 (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: preparing for protocol discussion (Thursday, 24 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Regrets (Monday, 7 February)
• regrets (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: binary RDF (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Some protocol & service description issues (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: some thoughts about current SOURCE/GRAPH design (Monday, 24 January)
• [crschmidt@crschmidt.net: Re: RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"] (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 11 Jan (Monday, 10 January)
• regrets (Saturday, 8 January)

Kevin Wilkinson

• Review of Sort Design (Thursday, 24 March)
• SPARQL v1.264 typos and a few comments (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Minutes RDF DAWG telecon 2005-03-15 for review (Friday, 18 March)

Michael Mealling

• An observation that might be useful... (Tuesday, 29 March)

Pat Hayes

• Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ (Thursday, 24 February)
• http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb (Monday, 21 February)
• comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005 (Wednesday, 19 January)

Robin Berjon

• binary RDF (Wednesday, 26 January)

Seaborne, Andy

• Re: comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: comment "Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc." on SOURCE, fromUnionQuery (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: solution/variable bindings (was Re: pls consider comments on disjunction) (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: pls consider comments on disjunction (Saturday, 26 March)
• Re: pls consider comments on disjunction (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: pls consider comments on disjunction (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: pls consider comments on disjunction (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: construct * (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: pls consider comments on disjunction (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: on Reification Semantics (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: SPARQL v1.264 typos and a few comments (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Minor format change (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: sparlx.rnc in CVS (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: UC&R updated (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously) (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Use cases for XML serialization (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: what about RDF format? (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: sparqlx (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: modulo operator dropped from editor's draft? (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: sparqlx (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: why is where keyword optional? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: how does select/project work with extra variables? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• SPARQL Abstract Syntax (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: GROUP BY [was: Comments list comments] (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: SELECT to involve expressions [was: Comments list comments] (Monday, 21 March)
• Comments list comments (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: Update on ORDERing solutions (Monday, 21 March)
• Update on ORDERing solutions (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: BaseDecl and PrefixDecl? (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requir ement (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: Casting a literal to a typed literal? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Syntax error in example from Section 8.3 of 17 Feb 05 Working Dra ft? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: protocol doc changed... (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: protocol doc changed... (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF Data Access ftf5-bos minutes: please review (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: rq23 update with latest syntax (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Working Draft feedback items (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: rq23 update with latest syntax (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Working Draft feedback items (Thursday, 10 March)
• rq23 update with latest syntax (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR. (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR. (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Working Draft feedback items (Sunday, 6 March)
• Re: CONSTRUCT * (Sunday, 6 March)
• CONSTRUCT * (Sunday, 6 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: preparing for protocol discussion (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: preparing for protocol discussion (Friday, 25 February)
• Some more tests (Friday, 25 February)
• Grammar update (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs) (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Some protocol & service description issues (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: sparqlParam: an approach to QL selection/migration (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: on log:definitiveService (Monday, 21 February)
• Values: general testing (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Value testing: implementing str() (Sunday, 20 February)
• Value testing: implementing str() (Sunday, 20 February)
• SPARQL-Q published (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: Tests for expressions : boolean effective values (Friday, 18 February)
• Tests for expressions : boolean effective values (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Some protocol & service description issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: ACTION: review "11 Testing Values" (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Monday, 14 February)
• Minor Syntax issues (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: question about combining patterns (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Feb (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Revised souce-named/untrusted-graph*.rq tests (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: minutes: RDF Data Access 19-20 Jan 2005 near Helsinki (please review) (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Optionals and execution order (Friday, 4 February)
• Optionals and execution order (Thursday, 3 February)
• RE: LOAD, FROM, GRAPH (Thursday, 3 February)
• RE: question about combining patterns (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: BOUND test case (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Definition of "RDF dataset" (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Definition of "RDF dataset" (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Some protocol & service description issues (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: about OPTIONAL blocks (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: nested SOURCE graph-patterns (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: any SOURCE * query example/test-case? (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Successive Bindings, cascaded queries in Algae2 (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: about the CONSTRUCT productions (Tuesday, 25 January)
• [Fwd: flexible SPARQL reification construct instead of hard-wired SOURCE keyword] (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times (Sunday, 16 January)
• SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: CONSTRUCT / template merging. (Thursday, 6 January)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Thursday, 6 January)

Steve Harris

• Regrets for 29th March (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: what about RDF format? (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Graph/data model specification (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: how does select/project work with extra variables? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Comments list comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Update on ORDERing solutions (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: Update on ORDERing solutions (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: XML serialization of SPARQL (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests (Monday, 14 March)
• Tests updated, new syntax and str() with ~= tests (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Working Draft feedback items (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR. (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Working Draft feedback items (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: CONSTRUCT * (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Thursday, 3 March)
• Testcase HTML building output (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: preparing for protocol discussion (Saturday, 26 February)
• OPTIONALs and constraints (Thursday, 24 February)
• FTF hosting offer for June 2005 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: on log:definitiveService (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closures) (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Value testing: implementing str() (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Value testing: implementing str() (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Minor Syntax issues (Sunday, 13 February)
• Review of RQ23 section 11, Testing Values (Wednesday, 9 February)
• ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: LOAD, FROM, GRAPH and COFFEE (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Please add RDF term checking operators to sparql (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: SOURCE : handling a graph read in twice at different times (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: issues poll: please partcipate! [was: more positions?] (Saturday, 15 January)
• Minutes of 2005-01-11 for review (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Tests dawg-opt-query-001 dawg-opt-query-002 and dawg-opt-query-003 (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 11 Jan (Tuesday, 11 January)

Thompson, Bryan B.

• Issue on bound() test? (Thursday, 31 March)
• RE: solution/variable bindings (was Re: pls consider comments on disjunction) (Sunday, 27 March)
• RE: pls consider comments on disjunction (Sunday, 27 March)
• RE: pls consider comments on disjunction (Sunday, 27 March)
• RE: pls consider comments on disjunction (Friday, 25 March)
• RE: pls consider comments on disjunction (Thursday, 24 March)
• RE: Data binding resource (Thursday, 24 March)
• Can we have interoperability without a formal semantics? (Was RE: Comments list comments) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• modulo operator dropped from editor's draft? (Monday, 21 March)
• RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: Feedback on Editor's Draft. (Thursday, 17 March)
• BaseDecl and PrefixDecl? (Thursday, 17 March)
• RE: Casting a literal to a typed literal? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Example in section 11.3 - prefix not declared, fails to use "&" f or function call. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• 11.2.1.8 sop:datatype uses non-xsd "integer" type. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• foaf prefix not declared in example from section 11.2.1.4 sop:isB lank (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Casting a literal to a typed literal? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Example in 10.4 is not valid per 17Feb05 grammar. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix. (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Wrong prefix in example in Section 9.3? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Syntax error in example from Section 8.3 of 17 Feb 05 Working Dra ft? (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTL R. (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Report on SPARQL Grammar implementation experience using ANTLR. (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RE: ftf5 attendance/regrets, WG membership standing (Friday, 18 February)

Tom Adams

• Resignation from DAWG (Tuesday, 1 February)

Yoshio FUKUSHIGE

• agenda+ on XML serialization (was Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)) (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed) (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: what about RDF format? (Thursday, 24 March)
• on Reification Semantics (Tuesday, 22 March)
• what about RDF format? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• variables as nodes? (re: XML Binding Format) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: SPARQL syntax proposals (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: collection access: inferred property vs. syntax (Wednesday, 2 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:07:34 UTC