- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:27:26 -0600
- To: Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com>
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
For tracking purposes, the minutes from last week should show these open: ACTION DaveB: to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH. ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol and these done: ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:52 +0100, Janne Saarela wrote: > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2005-03-22 14:30-16:30 UTC > log: http://www.w3.org/2005/03/22-dawg-irc.html > > chair: DanC > scribe: JanneS > > 1. Convene, take roll, review agenda > > Attending: > Dan Connolly > Kendall Clark > Andy Seaborne > Eric Prud'hommeaux > Hiroyuki Sato > Howard Katz > Janne Saarela > Jos De Roo > Kevin Wilkinson > Pat Hayes > Yoshio Fukushige > Dave Beckett > Steve Harris > Bryan Thompson > Bijan Parsia > > Regrets: none > > PROPOSED to accept as a true record of the last meeting: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0358.html > ACCEPTED with amendment of DaveB's regrets that were missing. > > Proposed agenda > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0372.html > > > > 2. issue: sort > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#sort > > The WG discussed whether SORT design and inclusion in the language will > continue or not. Poll showed interest to pursue the design further and > to keep sorting as an objective for DAWG. > > Kendall explicitly noted that new objectives are useful at this point > even if we don't do them; there's likely to be another charter, > eventually. they seem good input to that. > > As AndyS has suggested a design in > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#solutionsResults > > so the following 2 action items were assigned to review that design > > ACTION PatH: review sort design in 2 weeks > ACTION Kevin: review sort design at earliest convenience > > > > > 3. optional test for with background inference > > JosD had had an action item to > ACTION JosD: Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime > triple > > which is considered DONE in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0361.html > > DanC was expecting to see was expecting the inferred triple (whose > predicate is op:dateTime-greater-than ) in the input data and took an > action item > > ACTION DanC: follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple > > > > 4. Test suite maintenance > > JosD had had an action item to > ACTION JosD: propose a test based on dawg-triple-pattern-002 with a . in > a qname > > which is considered DONE in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0360.html > > The WG observed the . in a qname is only present in the input data, not > in the query language itself which we should be testing. > > SteveH noted there's a test with dot in the query language expression in > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-004 > > DaveB noted turtle definitions don't include dots in qnames and thus got > an action item to > > ACTION DaveB: consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle > > Other action items continued > > ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page > (continued) > ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named > graphs (continued) > ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve (continued) > ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to > valueTesting test cases) (continued - don't expect quick delivery) > > > > (moved to agenda item 9 for the sake of time) > > 9. requirements review before last call > > WG discussed how to publish the test cases document. SteveH volunteered > to make it into a NOTE > > ACTION SteveH: prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no > deadline/urgency) > > WG discussed publishing of the updated Use Cases and Requirements > document in > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases > > Section 2.18 that motivates WSDL was deemed to require some rewording > both in title and in contents. The wording now leads into thinking the > wsdl interface is mostly for inserting and not for querying. > > ACTION Kendall: To rewrite 2.18: change the title, don't motivate > "update", spell "WSDL" correctly. :> > > WG decided to publish updated documents > > ACTION KC, AFS, EP: publish usecases 1.148 + revision to 2.18 by KC, > reviewed by AFS, plus editorial fixups by KC, ok'd by EricP > > The remaining time WG spent discussing how members felt about the > inclusion of the new features (such as disjunction, sorting, casting, > update, xml serialization and wsdl) into the WG work. > > Some features were considered worth the effort with the conscious risk > of missing our known schedule. > > The philosophy of 'better right than fast' was appealing to many members > while acknowledging the contradiction with the ability to deliver in time. > > > Adjourned at 16:09 UTC. > > Next meeting: 29-March-2005 at 14:30 UTC. > > !!! Please be careful with the timing as Europe is moving into Summer > time next Sunday !!! > > Scribe for next meeting: N.N. (JanneS realized after the teleconf he > will be sitting in a car during next teleconf without being able to take > notes. No beer for Janne that is.) > > Janne -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 14:27:35 UTC