- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:18:56 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 7, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 13:17 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote: >> On Mar 7, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > [...] >>>> If the action was to show the feasibility, then it is completed. >>> >>> I suppose it's done to my satisfaction, >> >> When will you be sure? I mean, I do need to know whether this action >> is >> done. > > Flipping the "done" bit on an action is something we tend to do > as a group. Ok. > At a minimum, the chair notes it done in the > agenda, nobody requests a change to the agenda, and it goes > in the minutes as done. Got it. > In other cases, it gets scheduled for discussion; the owner > is asked whether they consider it done or not, and other > folks get a chance to negotiate. You might say "yes, I've > done as much as I intend to" and somebody might ask some > questions that motivate you to give it another go. > > So I'll be sure it's done Ok.that's a little different than "done to your satisfaction". Given that you are a member of the group, is there anything more you'd like to see on this action, other than the fixes I've sent? > when the minutes of tomorrow's > telcon come out (and nobody says they're wrong after a > few days). Sorry for conflating the "done" and "done to your satisfaction". I wasn't clear which hat you were wearing. So, I guess I just want to know if my filling in the blanks clarified the particular strategy we worked out. Oops. I see a follow up. Lemme switch over there. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 20:18:56 UTC