Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.

Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> Hum, I am not so comfortable with the notion that users would be unable
> to construct a graph using a SPARQL query.  Is that really the current
> position?  This seems to be a pretty based feature.
> 
> -bryan


It's just "CONSTRUCT *" that's removed, not CONSTRUCT.  Graphs can still be 
returned.  The choices I could see are in the referenced email -

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0240.html

 Andy

PS I am confused by the additional email addresses you added.

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seaborne, Andy
> To: Thompson, Bryan B.
> Cc: 'public-rdf-dawg@w3.org'
> Sent: 3/15/2005 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
> 
> Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> 
>>Hello,
>>
>>The CONSTRUCT * example in section 10.2 does not declare the "foaf"
>>prefix.
>>
>>CONSTRUCT * WHERE ( ?x foaf:name ?name )
>>
>>-bryan
>>
> 
> 
> Bryan,
> 
> Also fixed by removal - the section on "CONSTRUCT *" has been removed
> because 
> the definition doesn't work in the presence of GRAPH in the query.  The
> idea was 
> to return that subgraph that would give the same answers but with GRAPH
> the 
> query is over an RDF dataset, not a single graph.  The only alternative
> I can 
> think of at this late stage would be to allow "CONSTRUCT *" only if no
> GRAPH 
> keyword appears in the query.
> 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0240.html
> 
> and example 4:
> 
> CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o } WHERE
>     GRAPH ?g { ?s ?p ?o }
>     { ?g dc:publisher <http://www.w3.org/> }
>     { ?g dc:date ?date }
>     FILTER app:myDate(?date) > "2005-02-28T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime
> 
>  Thanks again,
>  Andy

Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 16:51:25 UTC