- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:00:43 +0000
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
OK, here's a sketch of how I would descibe my main service:
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix dawg: <http://example.com/dawg#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix akt: <http://www.aktors.org/ontology/> .
<http://triplestore.aktors.org/rdql/>
rdf:type dawg:HTTPQueryService ;
dawg:closedOver <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> ;
dawg:supportsDataType xsd:integer, xsd:float ;
dawg:querySyntax <http://www.w3.org/Submission/RDQL/> ;
dawg:resultFormat <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/> ;
dawg:usesOntology akt:support, akt:portal, akt:rdfcompat, akt:inca,
<http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>,
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
I attended a workshop on linking semnatic websites on Monday, and briefly
described the DAWG work, including the possibility of a description such
as this, and the idea was warmly received.
At the Helsinki FTF I was in favour of supporting single service URIs that
allowed query with a variety of syntaxes, mainly to prevent duplication of
query service descriptions, but since then I've reconsidered and I now
prefer something where each distinct query URI supports a specific query
syntax.
- Steve
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 15:00:47 UTC