- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:25:44 -0800
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
As long as people can help me figure out where those communities are, so I can find them, and give me a rough idea of what their needs might be so I can figure out some intelligent questions to ask. Kendall, if you're identifying yourself as a member of that community, are you saying that you're a potential user of such a XML-based sytnax? Can you give me a few pithy sentences why it would be useful to you? Howard > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Kendall Clark > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:39 AM > To: Howard Katz > Cc: andy.seaborne@hp.com; Bijan Parsia; Steve Harris; > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > Subject: Re: XML serialization of SPARQL > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:19:09AM -0800, Howard Katz wrote: > > > > B/ As the purpose is for XML tools, I'd like to see a input > from those > > > communities during the creation of the XML syntax, during the > > > requirments. > > > > +1. > > > > I'd be happy to help request/collate feedback in that area. > Whether it's me > > or somebody else: How do you define those communities? Who do > you see using > > an XML syntax and primarily to what end? > > Good questions; fwiw, I consider myself, by virtue of experience, > position, and interest, also a member of such communities. > > Howard, I'll be especially interested in yr feedback when the time > comes. ;> > > Kendall >
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 19:26:56 UTC