- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:42:47 +0000
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dave Beckett wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:05 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > >>v1.239 and above. >> >>First pass of an updated grammar. >> >>Examples converted to latest syntax >> >>Eric - I have converted the examples in section 11 and made alternations for ==, >>eq and ne to = < and > as I came across them. > > > Alternations? Do you mean '==' and 'eq' are sugar for the same > operation etc.? How does '<' and '>' relate to 'eq'? Can you please > list all these changes including the background operation they are > duplicates for. > > Thanks > > Dave > > I did try to update the table in rq23 giving the relationship of syntactic form and backing operation has been updated although it is Eric's call on this, not mime. Andy
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 10:42:58 UTC