- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:39:15 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:56:17 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > Andy, EricP, Dave, Steve, you guys have protocol implementations, right? > I'm particularly interested in > - any difference between what you've implemented and what's > in WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050114 Can't see anything immediatly, but my implementation is pretty incomplete. It might be better by monday. > - anything in your own design/implementation/service that > feels unresolved To early to tell I think. > - what you think is the right amount of service description stuff > to try to standardize I think: what schemas/ontologies are used what inferences are performed what datatypes are supported what SPARQL function extensions are supported ie. things that can e easily identified with w URI. - Steve
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 00:39:19 UTC