Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar

 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.1a
 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.2a
 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.3a
 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.4a

Minor: The examples are from sections 2.1, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 now.

 Andy

Dan Connolly wrote:
> 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>   2005-03-15T14:30Z
> 
>   tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>   supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>     log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/03/15-dawg-irc
> 
> scribe: ?VOLUNTEER_NEEDED
> 
> record for review
>  Minutes of 2005-03-08 Telecon for review
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0287.html
> 
> next meeting: 2005-03-22
>  scribe volunteer?
> 
> continue the following without discussion:
> ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement
> ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal
> ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption
> ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH.
> ACTION DaveB: to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer
> ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others)
> 
> comments on agenda? any progress on those actions that I can't see?
> 
> 
> 2. ftf5-bos records
> 
> PROPOSED: to approve
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html
>   $Revision: 1.48 $ of $Date: 2005/03/07 22:37:39 $
>   with the @@s removed.
> 
> 
> 2. SPARQL Protocol, SADDLE update
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0286.html
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.19 is progress on some of these...
> ACTION KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec.
> ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG:
> ACTION KendallC: to add "since we're using WSDL, you can use WS-Policy..." to protocol draft
> ACTION KendallC: to incorporate service description discussion notes in protocol spec
> 
> 
> 3. test updates from punctuationSyntax
> 
> ACTION SteveH: to to propose tests for str() and =~
> ACTION: SteveH to update the tests to reflect the new syntax
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0298.html
> 
> I take that as a proposal to (re-)approve these tests:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-001
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-002
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-003
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-004
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.1a
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.2a
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.3a
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.4a
> 
> Please be prepared to decide.
> 
> 
> 4. Test suite maintenance
> 
> ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
> ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs
> ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve
> ACTION JosD: Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple
> ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases)
> 
> 
> 5. Sorting issue/requirement?
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0296.html
> 
> 
> 6. Privacy/Security issue/requirement/objective?
> 
> ACTION DanC: to consider adding 'privacy/security' issue, even if we're
> most likely to just postpone it or mention it in passing in specs
> 
>

Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 14:28:29 UTC