- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:45:56 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Euler and cwm have some support for a list item construct.
Jos wrote the rules...
{?S rdf:first ?X} => {?S o:item ?X}.
{?S rdf:rest ?B. ?B o:item ?X} => {?S o:item ?X}.
in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0079.html
In Steve's service description sketch, he wrote...
<http://triplestore.aktors.org/rdql/>
dawg:closedOver <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> ;
to say that his service computes the RDFS closure of
the background graph.
In Helsinki, I think we talked about a way to associate
a service with rules that it can mix with the input data
to form the background graph.
one approach to the accessingCollections issue is to
take the o:item rules and put them somewhere... ah...
I think I've done this...
http://www.w3.org/2001/03swell/listsAx.n3
and write:
<http://eulerBasedService.example/svc>
sparql:backgroundRules <http://www.w3.org/2001/03swell/listsAx>.
which lets folks writing queries know that they can rely
on o:item triples being there.
Or we could simplify ala...
<http://eulerBasedService.example/svc>
a sparql:ServiceThatKnowsHowToAccessCollections.
I'm not sure I see enough value in standardizing this.
I think it's just as well for the cwm/euler folks to
write:
<http://eulerBasedService.example/svc>
log:backgroundRules <http://www.w3.org/2001/03swell/listsAx>.
and for folks that do what algae does to write...
<http://eulerBasedService.example/svc>
a algae:CollectionHandlingService.
for ref:
ACTION DanC: Write up definitive service concept
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item10
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item19
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 21:45:57 UTC