- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:07:45 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
wait a minute.. here's a test case I was actually working on (and which is running right now) given [ :operator :RXPelvisOfHipInjury; :precondition [ owl:intersectionOf ( :ConfirmNonPregnancy :PhysicalExamOfHipInjury ) ]; :action [ owl:intersectionOf ( :CADMeasurement :Diagnosis ) ]; :effect [ owl:unionOf ( :InsertHipBolt :ReplaceHip :RevalidationOfHipContusion ) ] ]. then I would really like to see the query equivalent with [] q:select {?X :andStep ?Y}; q:where {?S :operator ?X; :effect ?A. ?A owl:intersectionOf ?L. ?L o:item ?Y}. [] q:select {?X :orStep ?Y}; q:where {?S :operator ?X; :effect ?A. ?A owl:unionOf ?L. ?L o:item ?Y}. returning :RXPelvisOfHipInjury :orStep :InsertHipBolt. :RXPelvisOfHipInjury :orStep :ReplaceHip. :RXPelvisOfHipInjury :orStep :RevalidationOfHipContusion. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Sent by: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org 31/01/2005 16:42 To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org> cc: (bcc: Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER) Subject: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? While the lack of support for accessing collections has been noted in various places, we didn't identify it as a requirement (or even an objective) in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/ . If anybody now thinks it's a v1 requirement, speak now or forever hold your peace. It's also in order to share design ideas. But assuming no lightbulbs go off in such a way as to gain consensus, due to lack of design/implementation experience I propose we postpone this issue. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#accessingCollections -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 16:08:25 UTC