- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:43:22 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Bob write: -------- First, I am assuming that the following query returns no bindings: SELECT ?x ?y WHERE { ?book dc10:title ?x } I shouldn't since it doesn't refer to OPTIONAL or UNION within the query, and the spec cites those as prerequisites for allowing unbound values. -------- -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Mar/0048.html but I don't see it that way... my reading of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#select is that SELECT (i.e. projection) doesn't cause solutions to get rejected. The ?y is just noise. Would somebody please add this as a test case? EricP? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 22:43:24 UTC