- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:46:19 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2005-03-29T14:30Z **local timezone info below tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-irc scribe: ?? regrets: DaveB record for review: MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0472.html ammendment: show these two done: ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal and this one open: ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG. continue the following without discussion: ACTION DanC: follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) ACTION SteveH: prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency) next meeting: 5 Apr. scribe volunteer? comments on agenda? Due to the Easter holiday tomorrow and Monday, I'm drafting this tentative agenda early. I intend to either confirm or revise it 24hrs before the telcon. 2. Use Cases and Requirements publication ACTION Kendall: To rewrite 2.18: change the title, don't motivate "update", spell "WSDL" correctly. :> done: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases 1.149 ACTION KC, AFS, EP: publish usecases 1.148 + revision to 2.18 by KC, reviewed by AFS, plus editorial fixups by KC, ok'd by EricP 3. issue: sort ACTION Kevin: review sort design at earliest convenience http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0483.html perhaps that's a proposal about how to close the issue? ACTION PatH: review sort design in 2 weeks 4. issue: valueTesting ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) 5. SPARQL QL LC Candidate ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption (done, I think) ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH. (done?) ACTION DaveB: consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle (I see some progress in public-rdf-dawg-comments) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ $Revision: 1.270 $ of $Date: 2005/03/24 15:33:19 $ <AndyS> Quick status report on rq23: <AndyS> The current draft is, for my sections, adequate for WG review about issues. <AndyS> It is not finished - there are several ToDo items left <AndyS> The discussions on the comments list have been very useful but added a delay (work <AndyS> that woudl have to be done anyway) <AndyS> Not sure what the quality threshold shoudl be for a WG LC candidate. 6. privacy section for protocol spec ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0416.html not much response... everybody agrees? 7. issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol, fromUnionQuery http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG. progress: sparql-protocol.wsdl updated Kendall Clark (Monday, 21 March) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0382.html perhaps it addresses fromUnionQuery? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#fromUnionQuery 8. issue: xmlAbstractSyntax http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#xmlAbstractSyntax Note new issue, progress, discuss expectations, recruit owner? 9. issue: serviceDescription http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription Note formalized (not really new) issue. Discuss expectations. ** local timezone info [ tlt:localTime ( "Brussels" "Tue 3:30 PM" ), ( "Chicago" "Tue 8:30 AM" ), ( "London" "Tue 2:30 PM" ), ( "New York" "Tue 9:30 AM" ), ( "Rome" "Tue 3:30 PM" ), ( "Tokyo" "Tue 11:30 PM" ), ( "Vancouver" "Tue 6:30 AM" ); tlt:startTimePage <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=22&month=03&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>; cal:dtstart [ cal:dateTime "2005-03-22T14:30Z" ] ]. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:46:21 UTC