- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:46:19 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
2005-03-29T14:30Z **local timezone info below
tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-irc
scribe: ??
regrets: DaveB
record for review:
MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0472.html
ammendment: show these two done:
ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement
ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal
and this one open:
ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
propose to WG.
continue the following without discussion:
ACTION DanC: follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named
graphs
ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve
ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to
valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
ACTION SteveH: prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no
deadline/urgency)
next meeting: 5 Apr. scribe volunteer?
comments on agenda?
Due to the Easter holiday tomorrow and Monday, I'm drafting
this tentative agenda early. I intend to either confirm or revise
it 24hrs before the telcon.
2. Use Cases and Requirements publication
ACTION Kendall: To rewrite 2.18: change the title, don't motivate
"update", spell "WSDL" correctly. :>
done: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases 1.149
ACTION KC, AFS, EP: publish usecases 1.148 + revision to 2.18 by KC,
reviewed by AFS, plus editorial fixups by KC, ok'd by EricP
3. issue: sort
ACTION Kevin: review sort design at earliest convenience
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0483.html
perhaps that's a proposal about how to close the issue?
ACTION PatH: review sort design in 2 weeks
4. issue: valueTesting
ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others)
5. SPARQL QL LC Candidate
ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption
(done, I think)
ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH.
(done?)
ACTION DaveB: consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle
(I see some progress in public-rdf-dawg-comments)
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
$Revision: 1.270 $ of $Date: 2005/03/24 15:33:19 $
<AndyS> Quick status report on rq23:
<AndyS> The current draft is, for my sections, adequate for WG review
about issues.
<AndyS> It is not finished - there are several ToDo items left
<AndyS> The discussions on the comments list have been very useful but
added a delay (work
<AndyS> that woudl have to be done anyway)
<AndyS> Not sure what the quality threshold shoudl be for a WG LC
candidate.
6. privacy section for protocol spec
ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0416.html
not much response... everybody agrees?
7. issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol, fromUnionQuery
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
propose to WG.
progress:
sparql-protocol.wsdl updated Kendall Clark (Monday, 21 March)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0382.html
perhaps it addresses fromUnionQuery?
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#fromUnionQuery
8. issue: xmlAbstractSyntax
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#xmlAbstractSyntax
Note new issue, progress, discuss expectations, recruit owner?
9. issue: serviceDescription
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription
Note formalized (not really new) issue. Discuss expectations.
** local timezone info
[ tlt:localTime (
"Brussels"
"Tue 3:30 PM" ),
(
"Chicago"
"Tue 8:30 AM" ),
(
"London"
"Tue 2:30 PM" ),
(
"New York"
"Tue 9:30 AM" ),
(
"Rome"
"Tue 3:30 PM" ),
(
"Tokyo"
"Tue 11:30 PM" ),
(
"Vancouver"
"Tue 6:30 AM" );
tlt:startTimePage
<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=22&month=03&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>;
cal:dtstart [
cal:dateTime "2005-03-22T14:30Z" ] ].
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:46:21 UTC