- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:06:15 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:27:54PM +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.1a > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.2a > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.3a > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2.4a > > Minor: The examples are from sections 2.1, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 now. OK, I've changed the identifiers to sparql-query-example-[abcde] to avoid this happening again, and updated the comments to include the correct section. So, the URIs are now: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-a http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-b http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-c http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-d and http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-e which we didn't approve last time because the constraint syntax was contraversial. Perhaps we could this time? - Steve
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 15:06:19 UTC