- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:11:43 -0500
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:06:31PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Kendall - hope you well for the F2F. Thanks, Andy. I'll be there. > What I've implemented is "?query=...&lang=..." (paramter order does not > matter) over HTTP, and also plain GET (no query string). I use various > HTTP error codes as I saw a match at the time, including: Yr "query" and "lang" are equivalent IMO to the protocol draft's "query" and "query-lang". I prefer "query-lang" because it's more explicit than "lang", which could mean natural language, programming language, etc. But I take that they have the same semantics. > I haven't implemented "graph-uri=" (I intend to and I would if it is in the > protocol) but queries can have WITH/FROM. It is in the protocol, where it's spelled "graph-id". It's listed in the HTTP Query Parameters table. The cardinality is wrong and I need to remove the reference to the query language spec, but it's there. > "lang=" helps, if its a model-centric view, but I don't have any > reservations with the service-oriented view with service instance implying > query language. i.e. no "lang=" I don't either. I'll mark "query-lang" as optional. Hope this helps. Kendall
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:15:03 UTC