agenda+ on XML serialization (was Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed))

Hi,

Listening from answers from others,
I think there is a considerable concern
in the XML serialization of the results:
especially how to name of the variable node.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0427.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0454.html

Regards,
Yoshio
fuku@w3.org
fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
To: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:35 AM
Subject: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)


>
> 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>  2005-03-29T14:30Z **local timezone info below
>
>  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-irc
>
> scribe: ??
> regrets: DaveB, SteveH
>
> record for review:
> MInutes of the 2005-03-22 RDF DAWG teleconference for review
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0472.html
> ammendment: show these two done:
> ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement
> ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal
> and this one open:
> ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
> propose to WG.
>
>
> continue the following without discussion:
> ACTION DanC: follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
> ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
> ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named
> graphs
> ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve
> ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to
> valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
> ACTION SteveH: prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no
> deadline/urgency)
>
> next meeting: 5 Apr. scribe volunteer?
>
> comments on agenda?
> Due to the Easter holiday tomorrow and Monday, I'm drafting
> this tentative agenda early. I intend to either confirm or revise
> it 24hrs before the telcon.
>
>
>
> 2. Use Cases and Requirements publication
>
> ACTION Kendall: To rewrite 2.18: change the title, don't motivate
> "update", spell "WSDL" correctly. :>
> done: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases 1.149
>
> ACTION KC, AFS, EP: publish usecases 1.148 + revision to 2.18 by KC,
> reviewed by AFS, plus editorial fixups by KC, ok'd by EricP
> done:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20050325/
>
> and http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases is
> back to editor's draft status 1.158
>
>
> 3. issue: sort
>
> ACTION Kevin: review sort design at earliest convenience
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0483.html
>
> perhaps that's a proposal about how to close the issue?
>
> ACTION PatH: review sort design in 2 weeks
>
>
>
> 4. issue: valueTesting
>
> ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test
> cases, to EricP or others)
>
>
> 5. SPARQL QL LC Candidate
>
> ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption
> (done, I think)
>
> ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and
> GRAPH.
> (done?)
>
> ACTION DaveB: consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle
> (I see some progress in public-rdf-dawg-comments)
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
> $Revision: 1.270 $ of $Date: 2005/03/24 15:33:19 $
>
> <AndyS> Quick status report on rq23:
> <AndyS> The current draft is, for my sections, adequate for WG review
> about issues.
> <AndyS> It is not finished - there are several ToDo items left
> <AndyS> The discussions on the comments list have been very useful but
> added a delay (work
> <AndyS> that woudl have to be done anyway)
> <AndyS> Not sure what the quality threshold shoudl be for a WG LC
> candidate.
>
>
> 6. privacy section for protocol spec
>
> ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0416.html
>
> not much response... everybody agrees?
>
>
> 7. issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol, fromUnionQuery
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
>
> ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
> propose to WG.
>
> progress:
> sparql-protocol.wsdl updated Kendall Clark (Monday, 21 March)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0382.html
>
> perhaps it addresses fromUnionQuery?
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#fromUnionQuery
>
>
> 8. issue: xmlAbstractSyntax
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#xmlAbstractSyntax
>
> Note new issue, progress, discuss expectations, recruit owner?
>
>
> 9. issue: serviceDescription
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription
>
> Note formalized (not really new) issue. Discuss expectations.
>
>
>
> ** local timezone info
>
>      [      tlt:localTime  (
>            "Brussels"
>            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Chicago"
>            "Tue 8:30 AM"  ),
>                     (
>            "London"
>            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "New York"
>            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Rome"
>            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Tokyo"
>            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Vancouver"
>            "Tue 6:30 AM"  );
>             tlt:startTimePage
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=29&month=03&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>;
>             cal:dtstart  [
>                 cal:dateTime "2005-03-29T14:30Z" ] ].
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 03:27:53 UTC