accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience? from Dan Connolly on 2005-01-31 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2005)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:42:12 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1107186132.5017.29.camel@localhost>

While the lack of support for accessing collections has been
noted in various places, we didn't identify it as a requirement
(or even an objective) in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/ .
If anybody now thinks it's a v1 requirement, speak now or
forever hold your peace.

It's also in order to share design ideas.

But assuming no lightbulbs go off in such a way as to
gain consensus, due to lack of design/implementation experience
I propose we postpone this issue.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#accessingCollections

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 15:42:13 UTC