- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:03:11 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:33:37AM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > 2. ftf5 > > Feb 28-1Mar in Cambridge, MA, USA > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html > > Input to the agenda? > > 1st scribe? KendallC? Yes, especially if I show up this time! :> > 6. accessingCollections > > ACTION: DanC to discuss accessingCollections in service description > context > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0169.html > > postpone the issue? I want to consider this for protocol draft, but haven't had any time. I had yesterday set aside for protocol work and I ended up all day in a garage having my car repaired. :< I think, though, that I can have an updated protocol draft, which discharges many, if not all of my ACTIONs, by the end of business tomorrow. Does that make f2f discussion impossible or only a bit harder? Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 13:06:25 UTC