- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:56:17 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Re "SPARQL Protocol for RDF editor's drft @@to be provided by Wed, 23 Feb" -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#rdl Kendall called me to let me know that continued illness etc. messed up plans to have a new draft for review yesterday. He may have some time this weekend. I don't expect everybody to read whatever he comes up with overnight, so we'll use the W3C Working Draft 14 January 2005 as the starting-page for the ftf meeting... http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050114/ which is, aside from title page decoration, the same as the current editor's draft... 1.15 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ But in any case... if you have protocol thoughts and have been waiting for a new draft before sharing them, please don't wait any longer. In particular, these threads: Some protocol & service description issues Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 25 January) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0046.html SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd) Dirk-Willem van Gulik (Thursday, 20 January) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0035.html ACTION SteveH: Write up a service description of features supported for his service http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0113.html LOAD, FROM, GRAPH and COFFEE Eric Prud'hommeaux (Thursday, 27 January) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0067.html Andy, EricP, Dave, Steve, you guys have protocol implementations, right? I'm particularly interested in - any difference between what you've implemented and what's in WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050114 - anything in your own design/implementation/service that feels unresolved - what you think is the right amount of service description stuff to try to standardize -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:56:19 UTC