Re: Working Draft feedback items

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:26:13AM +0000, Dave Beckett wrote:

> There is no need to support this triple bloat.  Reification has remained
> a bad idea since 1998.

Hmm, I have to disagree with Dave here. Reification is useful and the
issue of whether it does (or must) cause "triple bloat" is orthogonal
to our purpose here (IMO).

> If anything deserves more syntax support in isn't this, it's collections
> which helps modern RDF designs such as OWL.

They both do. We really need something for collections! Making SPARQL
unuseful over OWL ontologies is a very bad thing.


Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 14:01:06 UTC