- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:29:17 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:52:17 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:51 -0500, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > as promised, AND is now FILTER: > > SELECT ?who > > WHERE { ?who :age ?n. FILTER ?n + 1 < 5 } > > This I like, as it was pretty much how I thought about constraints - get > a bunch of triples then filter them with a big expression. Its cleaner than AND, but I think we should avoid FILTER ?x + 1 < 4 FILER ?y + 2 < 4 even though it makes sense if it has the same semantics as AND, it reads a bit oddly I have a mild preference for a closer relationship to SQL: SELECT ?var FROM { :a :b ?var } WHERE ?var < 3 But I can see why that might be confusing. - Steve
Received on Friday, 4 March 2005 18:13:46 UTC