- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:05:50 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2005-02-15T14:30Z tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/02/15-dawg-irc scribe: Dave Beckett record for review: Minutes of 2005-02-08 Telecon for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0115.html next meeting: 22 Feb. scribe? note the following done without discussion: ACTION: KendallC to Announce the protocol spec (I haven't seen pointers, but I heard from Kendall that this is done.) continue the following without discussion: ACTION: DanC to ask Liam, via SemWeb CG, which XML groups might be interested in SPARQL result set WD ACTION: KendallC: to propose a solution to protocolRootReferent ACTION: SteveH to to propose tests for str() and =~ ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs ACTION: DanC: suggest formal definitions for SOURCE ACTION: DaveB: discuss warnings in result set spec ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve comments on agenda? (this time it's rushed, rather than being quite so late.) 2. ftf6 Sorry, ftf6 agenda is late. ACTION: DanC to consider Asemantics hosting proposal w.r.t. WG schedule ACTION: SteveH to propose to host in Southampton right after XTech ACTION: PatH to propose to host in Florida I would have liked to get my head around those sooner. Let's decided during ftf6. 3. valueTesting, XSCH ACTION: EricP and PathH will review XSCH draft document http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ CONTINUED (with progress) ACTION: SteveH to review <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0114.html ACTION: JosD to review <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests> 4. SPARQL QL pub ACTION: EricP to to update rq23 w.r.t. BOUND/UNSAID ACTION: EricP, make sure editor's draft as an inline issue (to be published) that we need to work this out Minor Syntax issues Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 11 February) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0118.html 5. Service Descriptions ACTION: SteveH to Write up a service description of features supported for his service http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0113.html ACTION: KendallC to to think about predicate to relate html-forms and svc descriptions, and how this goes into the spec ACTION: KendallC to Add section for service descriptions and put graph specifying in it to start it off ACTION: KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec. ACTION: DanC to Write up definitive service concept ACTION: DanC to write up "sparqlParam" approach (reply to kendallC) ACTION: DanC to discuss accessingCollections in service description context ACTION: EricP: to inviestigate WSDL/SOAP encodings of SPARQL protocol -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 15:05:52 UTC