- From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:46:51 -0500
- To: "'Seaborne, Andy '" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Cc: "''public-rdf-dawg@w3.org' '" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, "Personick, Michael R." <MICHAEL.R.PERSONICK@saic.com>, "Bebee, Bradley R." <BRADLEY.R.BEBEE@saic.com>
Hum, I am not so comfortable with the notion that users would be unable
to construct a graph using a SPARQL query. Is that really the current
position? This seems to be a pretty based feature.
-bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Seaborne, Andy
To: Thompson, Bryan B.
Cc: 'public-rdf-dawg@w3.org'
Sent: 3/15/2005 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: CONSTRUCT * example in 10.2 does not declare "foaf" prefix.
Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The CONSTRUCT * example in section 10.2 does not declare the "foaf"
> prefix.
>
> CONSTRUCT * WHERE ( ?x foaf:name ?name )
>
> -bryan
>
Bryan,
Also fixed by removal - the section on "CONSTRUCT *" has been removed
because
the definition doesn't work in the presence of GRAPH in the query. The
idea was
to return that subgraph that would give the same answers but with GRAPH
the
query is over an RDF dataset, not a single graph. The only alternative
I can
think of at this late stage would be to allow "CONSTRUCT *" only if no
GRAPH
keyword appears in the query.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0240.html
and example 4:
CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o } WHERE
GRAPH ?g { ?s ?p ?o }
{ ?g dc:publisher <http://www.w3.org/> }
{ ?g dc:date ?date }
FILTER app:myDate(?date) > "2005-02-28T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime
Thanks again,
Andy
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 16:47:03 UTC