agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Mar

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://
    log to appear:


record for review
 Minutes of 2005-03-08 Telecon for review

next meeting: 2005-03-22
 scribe volunteer?

continue the following without discussion:
ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement
ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal
ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption
ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH.
ACTION DaveB: to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer
ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others)

comments on agenda? any progress on those actions that I can't see?

2. ftf5-bos records

PROPOSED: to approve
  $Revision: 1.48 $ of $Date: 2005/03/07 22:37:39 $
  with the @@s removed.

2. SPARQL Protocol, SADDLE update 1.19 is progress on some of these...
ACTION KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec.
ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG:
ACTION KendallC: to add "since we're using WSDL, you can use WS-Policy..." to protocol draft
ACTION KendallC: to incorporate service description discussion notes in protocol spec

3. test updates from punctuationSyntax

ACTION SteveH: to to propose tests for str() and =~
ACTION: SteveH to update the tests to reflect the new syntax

I take that as a proposal to (re-)approve these tests:

Please be prepared to decide.

4. Test suite maintenance

ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs
ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve
ACTION JosD: Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple
ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases)

5. Sorting issue/requirement?

6. Privacy/Security issue/requirement/objective?

ACTION DanC: to consider adding 'privacy/security' issue, even if we're
most likely to just postpone it or mention it in passing in specs

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 14:17:34 UTC