- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:21:17 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 04:57:01 +0100, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: > > > If i understand right, it is not the same as in my example > > In my example I was binding the reification node, something defined in > the standard, and that can be used to define the context of that triple > with ease (you got a node, you can attach metadata to it, simple). Ah, I see. Yes, I misunderstood I thought you were discussing reification in the general sense, rather than RDF Reification. RDF Reification doesnt address the issue of the "source" of a triple, it just provides a syntaxic shortcut to express a triple in its exploded form, so it doesnt support what I personally require for triple identification. - Steve
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 09:27:09 UTC